Solved

Acess related question

Posted on 2009-04-10
10
280 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-18
Have a DB used for ordering. In the past we have had records created in advance. The Manager who needs to approve the request was on the record in an author and reader field. The default access in the past has been author. We are revising it so that only certain people will be able to enter requests so I have changed the default access to No Access.
We still have several requests that were in the DB prior to this change, but I thought with them being in the record as Manager and listed in the Reader and Author field that they would still be able to access. What should I set the access at so that new requests can only be submitted by users in the new access group, but also so old requests can still be approved by the mgr named on the record.
0
Comment
Question by:jforget1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
10 Comments
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:pclark6127
ID: 24117652
Have you thought about using a 2nd reader/author field?
0
 

Author Comment

by:jforget1
ID: 24117676
Well I giess my issue is if default access is No Access and the person accessing the form is only in the reader and author fields on the form should they have access?

What would the 2nd author/reader field be used for in this case?
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
SysExpert earned 167 total points
ID: 24118305
so that you can put in the manager for the requests.

What default access are you changing ?

ACL on DB ?

DOcument Access ?

If ACL, then give temporary access as Author or whatever to the maangers to finish the remaining  entries.

Once done, remove it.


I hope this helps !
0
 

Author Comment

by:jforget1
ID: 24118359
If I change it back to Author, which is where it was, would users, not associated with the database all be able to submit entries. If that is the case I could hide the button for new order forms.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:SysExpert
ID: 24118737
Yes, they would, so hiding the button would be a good idea, as well as giving them a popup or warning that they are not allowed access any more.

0
Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

 
LVL 46

Assisted Solution

by:Sjef Bosman
Sjef Bosman earned 166 total points
ID: 24122343
As the name says, Author fields ONLY work for someone who has Author rights in the database. So a user with only Reader rights (or less) will NEVER have the necessary rights to edit a document, even a new one (unless Depositor), not even a document with an Author-field with his name in it.

If all document in a database have Author and Reader fields, and none of these fields contain user X, then user X won't see a single document, even if user X has Author rights to the database.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:mbonaci
mbonaci earned 167 total points
ID: 24122654
> As the name says...
Yes, but lets not make it the rule...  What does the Reader name says?

While Author field works only for ACL Authors, Reader field, on the other hand, works for everyone (except for users with full access admin option in effect), not only for ACL Readers.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:mbonaci
ID: 24122669
Here's the old post which verry well explains Reader/Author fields:
http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/46dom.nsf/7e6c7e584a76331b85256a46006f083e/e0359d10a2307d1885256c61000707b7?OpenDocument

And here's the new one (also comprehensive):
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/reader-names/index.html


Hope this helps,
Mb¤
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Sjef Bosman
ID: 24122742
LOL You're absolutely right :-P

I was more interested in the meaning of the following sentence:

> ... them being in the record as Manager ...

Can you explain, jforget?
0
 

Author Comment

by:jforget1
ID: 24129216
> ... them being in the record as Manager ...   There are 2 fields in the record, one for Operations Manager of the office and one for Managing director of the office. Not related to Notes at all in this case. Both of these users are in a reader and author field. I guess I need to leave it on Author as a default and hide the button so it is only visible to the new group of people I have in a group in the ACL.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I thought it will be a good idea to make a post as it will help in case someone else faces these issues. I trust this gives an idea how each entry in Notes.ini can mean a lot for the Domino Server to be functioning properly. This article discusses t…
For beginners of Lotus Notes user this is important to know about the types of files and their location supported by IBM Notes. Mostly users are unaware about how many file types are created and what their usages are. This Article is fully dedicated…
This demo shows you how to set up the containerized NetScaler CPX with NetScaler Management and Analytics System in a non-routable Mesos/Marathon environment for use with Micro-Services applications.
A short film showing how OnPage and Connectwise integration works.

932 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

17 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now