Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

ESXi and SFU 3.5

Posted on 2009-04-15
11
Medium Priority
?
505 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-19
We are running a Windows 2003 Standard server as a vm using VMware ESXi.  This server is running service for unix 3.5.  We have 2 NFS shares setup on the Windows server which exports to 2 other Unix servers.  The VM is setup using 4GBs of ram and 4 processor running at 2.4Ghz a piece.  We are noticing high CPU utiliaztion with the rpcxdr.sys driver which is used primarliy for SFU.  CPU will spike to over 90% and users notice slowness accessing server.  Is there anything I can do to decrease the overhead used by SFU and is there any known problems using SFU with VMWare ESXi?  Any ideas would be very helpful.  Thanks  
0
Comment
Question by:isgrot
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 5
11 Comments
 
LVL 62

Expert Comment

by:gheist
ID: 24149224
It is DNS server timeout - quite popular in common AD scenarios.
All the "transparent" "background" DNS synchronisations causes that.
I would suggest running NFS on Linux or BSD as it is intended to be.
0
 

Author Comment

by:isgrot
ID: 24149368
Unfortuanaltly, this is the setup we have and need to stick with for the time being.  Are you saying DNS lookups cause the CPU to spike?  Are there any work arounds to this problem?
0
 
LVL 62

Expert Comment

by:gheist
ID: 24149600
DNS cache in front of AD DNS server, running BIND on Linux (mandriva or ubuntu for easy setup in ESXi)
0
Learn how to optimize MySQL for your business need

With the increasing importance of apps & networks in both business & personal interconnections, perfor. has become one of the key metrics of successful communication. This ebook is a hands-on business-case-driven guide to understanding MySQL query parameter tuning & database perf

 

Author Comment

by:isgrot
ID: 24149673
So you think I should setup a Linux VM to NFS to Unix servers and have Windows pull files from there?
0
 
LVL 62

Expert Comment

by:gheist
ID: 24149761
You have to install DNS cache to cover AD DNS defect (or make DNS and Users synchronize nightly)
Basically Windows NFS is not getting machine name from IP and polls connection eating out CPU time.
0
 

Author Comment

by:isgrot
ID: 24149792
What if I setup mounts in Unix to connect directly to IP and not hostname?
0
 
LVL 62

Expert Comment

by:gheist
ID: 24149904
It queries for name of client IP.
It is really minimal Linux installation, which saves the day when you reboot or break AD controller(s)
0
 

Author Comment

by:isgrot
ID: 24150459
This setup is just not visable for our network.  We are limited to what we can setup due to secuirty issues.  Are there any tweaks that can be made with SFU to reduce the amount of overhead it uses?  
0
 
LVL 62

Expert Comment

by:gheist
ID: 24150530
NO, no tweaks, maybe "Microsoft Update" knows better.
I cannot promise this is solution: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=70ae23c2-3ae8-4ea6-ba8d-8ac7e4f82663&displaylang=en

You can actually install DNS service on host to cache AD DNS records.
0
 

Author Comment

by:isgrot
ID: 24150850
"You can actually install DNS service on host to cache AD DNS records."

This is interesting idea.  So I would install DNS on my Windows VM and set it to cache records?  How do you setup a DNS server to just cache for that host?  This cannot run full DNS becuase it will violate security policy here.  I know I sound like a broken record but we have to be careful what we install here.
0
 
LVL 62

Accepted Solution

by:
gheist earned 2000 total points
ID: 24150900
Ask your security policemen to elaborate...
You just have to run DNS service with forwarders being AD masters...
0

Featured Post

Understanding Web Applications

Without even knowing it, most of us are using web applications on a daily basis. Gmail and Yahoo email, Twitter, Facebook, and eBay are used by most of us daily—and they are web applications. We often confuse these web applications tools for websites.  So, what is the difference?

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Originally, this post was published on Monitis Blog, you can check it here . It goes without saying that technology has transformed society and the very nature of how we live, work, and communicate in ways that would’ve been incomprehensible 5 ye…
This article explains the fundamentals of industrial networking which ultimately is the backbone network which is providing communications for process devices like robots and other not so interesting stuff.
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

664 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question