EVA 4400 and mixed size Disk Group

We have an EVA 4400 with a single shelf containing 8 x 146gb drives.   If we add 4 x 400gb disks in the remaining bays whats the maximum capacity we can get?  Note, we require a decent level of redundancy as the EVA will we be running critical systems.

Thanks
kswan_expertAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

dolomitiCommented:
hi,
if you add new HDs to your Storage, and these are of different size of previous
(400,146) , you cannot add the 400s to any existing array. You have to build
a new array, then split(or take whole) this in LV(s), then LUN(s).
You can build a RAID5 having 400x3GB resultant, or RAID10 (=400x2), or
2 RAID1 (2 x 400).

Does just one server access the storage ?

If you build another Array->Lun, you'll see this as a new disk in server
(which OS ?), partition it(Unix or Win), Format(U/W with diff commands) and
create a new volume (Letter in Win F:) or mount this partition under an existing
directory (in Unix this is the sole possible method) but you can also do this in Win
OS. If you need space on your C: or E: disk, and you know all growing space will
concentrate in a dir, you can move these in anothe location, mount new partition under this dir, re-copy moved files in that dir. Physically the files will go in the new 4x400GBHDs, even OS continues to write undes C:\MyApplication.

bye
vic
0
andyalderCommented:
You can have mixed drive sizes in an EVA disk group but it's not a good idea since they will have many more disks accesses than the current disks and will therefore becone "hot" disks. re-levelling based on I/O will be competing with re-levelling based on capacity usage. Sparing as well as parity will also eat up the size of the largest disk in the group.

So assuming vRAID5 with a sparing level of one, 146*8 + 400*4 - 400(parity) -400 (spare) = 1968GB (of course occupancy alarm will be going potty by that time as it goes off when there is 15% space left)

Assuming vRAID5 with sparing of two, 146*8 + 400*4 -400(parity) -2*400(spare) = 1568GB.

I'm afraid that what dolomiti says doesn't work since you cannot make a disk group with less than 8 disks on an EVA.

See also this thread, http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1240392856274+28353475&threadId=1116697




0
andyalderCommented:
Oops, knock 400GB off the above calcs, vRAID 5 uses 1 parity for every 8 disks in the disk group so parity will take up 800GB in each case, not 400GB.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
kswan_expertAuthor Commented:
Cheers Andy.  
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Storage

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.