[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

Referencing .net class (Late Binding)

Posted on 2009-05-05
8
Medium Priority
?
349 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-17
I have a c# project that references a com object. The com object can only be installed on one computer. I want to deploy the project on many computers.
Normally I would have used CreateObject on a switch.
// e.g. 
if (GetSetting("Connect")){
 
   mobjConnect = //CreateObject("My.Class");
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:ClearRock
  • 5
  • 3
8 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:ClearRock
ID: 24303069
Thanks ... seems a bit complicated
I've been looking at 'System.Activator - Activator.CreateInstance(type As System.Type)' which is the eq of create instance. Is there a similar one for .net dlls save having to reference etc...

Create instance appears not to like my .net dll but does like good old com dlls (Word);
John
0
 
LVL 83

Accepted Solution

by:
CodeCruiser earned 1050 total points
ID: 24303166
According to MSDN, CreateInstance can be used to create instances of .NET types. In the following example, createinstance is being used to create object of type StringBuilder which is a .NET type.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wccyzw83.aspx

There may be some other problem such as no default constructor in the class.
0
Get free NFR key for Veeam Availability Suite 9.5

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license (1 year, 2 sockets) to all certified IT Pros. The license allows for the non-production use of Veeam Availability Suite v9.5 in your home lab, without any feature limitations. It works for both VMware and Hyper-V environments

 

Author Comment

by:ClearRock
ID: 24304686
obviously more complicated than i thought
See the code below...
Thanks for the help...
//Fine
object cpay = Activator.CreateInstance("SIM", "CPayroll");
//object cpay = Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetTypeFromProgID("SIM.CPayroll"));
//OK (as expected)
//CPayroll cpay = new CPayroll();
//Compile Error --- 'object' does not contain a definition for 'SetPerson'
cpay.SetPerson(sNiNumber, sTitle, sFirst, sLast, dteDOB,sAddress1,sAddress2, sAddress3, sAddress4, sAddress5, sPostCode,
dteDateStarted, IsMale, sInitials, IsMarried, sEmail,sNiNumber, sHomePhone,sOtherHomePhone, sMobilePhone,sOtherMobilePhone);

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 83

Expert Comment

by:CodeCruiser
ID: 24304736
"This method is provided for COM support. ProgIDs are not used in theMicrosoft .NET Framework because they have been superseded by theconcept of namespace.This method is provided for COM support. ProgIDs are not used in the Microsoft .NET Framework because they have been superseded by the concept of namespace."

This is what Microsoft says about GetTypeFromProgID. Is the type a .NET class? Then try this
GetType(Sim.CPayroll) (VB!)
0
 
LVL 83

Expert Comment

by:CodeCruiser
ID: 24304748
Microsoft said it only once!
0
 

Author Comment

by:ClearRock
ID: 24304890
Hi CodeCruiser

My prob is not the specific really but the general. In the old days (a long time ago) I used to be able to late bind an object (CreateObject) dependant on it being there. I have my interface to SIM in a seperate assembly all working and nice, but it depends entirely on SIM being installed as SIM costs a lot it is only installed on some m/cs. I want to be able to deploy my lot so it works whether or not SIM is installed (and later will pick up SIM if it gets installed). I'm not that bothered in what .net 3.5 no longer does but rather what it could do. It would seem to me that I could instantiate my sim object and then use it as an object rather than a type. If that is not possible then I'll skin the cat another way.
e.g. within a functon....
1 Instantiate the assembly + class with the current code knowing nothing about its existance (not referenced)
2 Use the functions in the class
3 Ditch it
I check wether the installation of SIM is present and run or block the function accordingly (Actually blocking the menu at the moment).

If I reference the class and it cannot see SIM the whole thing pours out errors which is not so nice in front of customers!

If you have a good option I'd be gratefull, otherwise time suggests taking another route.

Thanks
John
0
 
LVL 83

Expert Comment

by:CodeCruiser
ID: 24305001
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

It seems a simple enough task, yet I see repeated questions asking how to do it: how to pass data between two forms. In this article, I will show you the different mechanisms available for you to do just that. This article is directed towards the .N…
Wouldn’t it be nice if you could test whether an element is contained in an array by using a Contains method just like the one available on List objects? Wouldn’t it be good if you could write code like this? (CODE) In .NET 3.5, this is possible…
We’ve all felt that sense of false security before—locking down external access to a database or component and feeling like we’ve done all we need to do to secure company data. But that feeling is fleeting. Attacks these days can happen in many w…
Despite its rising prevalence in the business world, "the cloud" is still misunderstood. Some companies still believe common misconceptions about lack of security in cloud solutions and many misuses of cloud storage options still occur every day. …
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month20 days, 6 hours left to enroll

873 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question