?
Solved

DFS Namespace Server Referral Ordering

Posted on 2009-05-05
2
Medium Priority
?
704 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-21
Hello All

I'm attempting to create file server redundancy in my company by using DFS to mirror data on a number of shared folders. This in itself is straight forward, but I'm working to eliminate the problem of having two people working on the same document at once. I think I've got a solution, but it's not behaving entirely right. The two servers I'm using are running Windows Server 2k3 Standard edition, one is R2 SP2, the other is the original release (not R2) SP2. Following these directions: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc758992.aspx I've overriden the referral ordering on the one server to be "first among all targets" and the other to "last among all targets". Now when I attempt to connect to the namespace, approx. 50-75% of the clients connect to the correct server (the one set to "first..."), while the remainder connect to the incorrect machine. I've attempted using dfsutil /pktflush and /purgemupcache then reconnecting, but it is not always successfull. I believe targets are still being randomly chosen. Any suggestions on how to point clients to a single server during normal operation? I know I could disable the referral to the 2nd machine, but that would require manual intervention in the event of a failure. Assistance would be appreciated, thanks in advance.
0
Comment
Question by:jostafew
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 17

Assisted Solution

by:OriNetworks
OriNetworks earned 1000 total points
ID: 24310254
On the client machines you could try ipconfig /flushdns becuase it may be caching the original IP address that it used when it did the first lookup before you made the change.
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
jostafew earned 0 total points
ID: 24316319
I believe things may be behaving now, I suspect the system needed more time to send the dfs configurations to settle in. This morning I come back and the couple machines that were misbehaving pulled the proper dfs target after a /pktflush, /purgemupcache, and a restart. Thanks for the suggestion with the /flushdns, I'll keep that in mind.
0

Featured Post

Get real performance insights from real users

Key features:
- Total Pages Views and Load times
- Top Pages Viewed and Load Times
- Real Time Site Page Build Performance
- Users’ Browser and Platform Performance
- Geographic User Breakdown
- And more

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Recently, I had the need to build a standalone system to run a point-of-sale system. I’m running this on a low-voltage Atom processor, so I wanted a light-weight operating system, but still needed Windows. I chose to use Microsoft Windows Server 200…
On July 14th 2015, Windows Server 2003 will become End of Support, leaving hundreds of thousands of servers around the world that still run this 12 year old operating system vulnerable and potentially out of compliance in many organisations around t…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …
Sometimes it takes a new vantage point, apart from our everyday security practices, to truly see our Active Directory (AD) vulnerabilities. We get used to implementing the same techniques and checking the same areas for a breach. This pattern can re…
Suggested Courses

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question