Solved

Backup Exec Question

Posted on 2009-05-06
4
589 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
I'm getting ready to back up around 50GB - 75GB of data from 3 office across the WAN. This WAN has T1 connections. I'm using Symantec Backup Exec with remote agents on the servers in the remote locations. All the remote locations would be backing up the data across the WAN to a SAN. My question is, is backing up this amount of data recomended across a WAN or should I just install Backup Exec at the remote sites & put the backups locally? Any opinions would be appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:wantabe2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:sciphre
sciphre earned 250 total points
ID: 24319616
It would take you days to copy 75 GB of data over a 1.5 Mbit link.
Absolutely not - install BE at the remote sites and if you need to get the data to your central locations investigate an option with incremental disk based backups for dailies and a full monthly backup broken in 2 GB chunks, which you could maybe transfer over robocopy once a month, eating up bandwidth during the night for a week or so . I'm honestly only giving this as an option due to the financial crisis...
0
 
LVL 9

Assisted Solution

by:L3370
L3370 earned 250 total points
ID: 24320627
If you are in a windows 2003 environment you may want to consider Distributed File System and replication.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/storage/dfs/default.mspx

Have the remote sites set to replicate with your local systems.  The initial replication can be a pain and take up lots of bandwidth, but will not hog bandwidth afterwards because it only replicates changed data.

Don't know if this is suitable for your needs and $ requirements, but its an idea.

0
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
wantabe2 earned 0 total points
ID: 24321089
Thanks sciphre & L3370. That's what I was thinking about the T1 lines. I considered DFS & we do have Win 2003 R2 right now but are also getting ready to upgrade to Windows 2008. Can I still do DFS with Win 2008? Would you recomend doing DFS on the 2003 boxes & then doing the upgrade or do the upgrade to 2008 & then setup DFS? Thanks again.
0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:L3370
ID: 24327077
That's a good question wantabe.

Win2008 does have DFS, and I've heard there's even been some beneficial updates to DFS.  What I don't know is how streamlined the process is when migrating from 2003 to 2008. I have no working knowledge of 2k8 so its not a call I could make

But if the 2008 upgrade is coming soon I'd hold off till then I guess. No sense in doing things twice if you can prevent it hehe.
0

Featured Post

Threat Intelligence Starter Resources

Integrating threat intelligence can be challenging, and not all companies are ready. These resources can help you build awareness and prepare for defense.

Join & Write a Comment

By default, Carbonite Server Backup manages your encryption key for you using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 128-bit encryption. If you choose to manage your private encryption key, your backups will be encrypted using AES 256-bit encryption.
How to update Firmware and Bios in Dell Equalogic PS6000 Arrays and Hard Disks firmware update.
This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

708 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

13 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now