Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

ParameterizedThreadStart with parameter

Posted on 2009-05-07
14
Medium Priority
?
11,108 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-06
How do I let the ParameterizedThreadStart take a List<byte> as a parameter ?
List<byte> pmList = new List<byte>();
 
ParameterizedThreadStart pts = new ParameterizedThreadStart(CheckPunches);
                        Thread t = new Thread(pts);
                        t.Start(pmList);
 
private void CheckPunches(List<byte> bBuffer)
{
 
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:u2envy1
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 5
  • 3
14 Comments
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
CuteBug earned 2000 total points
ID: 24324822
You have to declare CheckPunches in the following way
            List<byte> pmList = new List<byte>();
 
            ParameterizedThreadStart pts = new ParameterizedThreadStart(CheckPunches);
            Thread t = new Thread(pts);
            t.Start(pmList);
 
 
        }
 
        private void CheckPunches(object data)
        {
            List<byte> pmList = (List<byte>)data;
        }

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 24324919
Perfecto !!
How do I call the CheckPunches in a ThreadPool.... ?
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:CuteBug
ID: 24324955
WaitCallback workItem = new WaitCallback(CheckPunches);
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(CheckPunches,  pmList);
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 

Author Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 24325093
Thanks....
Can I add this in a loop or should I keep the WaitCallback outside the loop ?
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:CuteBug
ID: 24325208
Which loop are you referring to?
0
 

Author Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 24325261
Sorry...... My loop looks like this.

Process Buffer()
{
do
{
 
WaitCallback workItem = new WaitCallback(CheckPunches);
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(CheckPunches,  pmList);
pmList = Connection.ReadData();
 
}
While(pmList.Count() != 0);
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:tculler
ID: 24325338
You can actually just omit the WaitCallback delegate decleration entirely; there's no reason for it, really.

Also, you're going to get a compiler error on line 11 for 2 reasons: first, "while" is capitalized. Second, the List object's Count method is actually a property, so you'll need to remove those parentheses.

Using the ThreadPool and individual threads are completely different things, so if you'd like me to explain what's going on here, I can :)
Nate
0
 

Author Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 24325429
Sorry about the two mistakes. Was just typing over my head.
So you saying that every time I call the CheckPunches it will be executed in a new thread with out the WaitCallback delegate ?
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:CuteBug
ID: 24325556
WaitCallback delegate is required.

@u2envy1:
By the way, It should be ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(workItem, pmList);

And yes it should be within the loop. Therefore each time the pmList gets new data, a new instance of CheckPunches is added to the ThreadPool for processing.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 31578959
Thx..... all your help is much appreciated
0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:tculler
ID: 24326077
Hate to go back and forth here, but... The WaitCallback delegate is NOT required. The compiler will automatically do this for you--there's no reason to create it yourself. The following will work just fine.
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(YourMethod, pmList);
// "YourMethod" should match the name of the handling method. Be sure
// to omit the parentheses "()"
 
void YourMethod(Object myData) 
{
     // Processing, etc etc
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:CuteBug
ID: 24326183
tculler, you are right.
my mistake.
0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:tculler
ID: 24326251
No problem, honest mistake ;)
0
 

Author Comment

by:u2envy1
ID: 24326348
Thx guys......
tculler: Sorry I neva award you with some points.
0

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar: Networking for the Cloud Era

Ready to improve network connectivity? Watch this webinar to learn how SD-WANs and a one-click instant connect tool can boost provisions, deployment, and management of your cloud connection.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: Ivo
C# And Nullable Types Since 2.0 C# has Nullable(T) Generic Structure. The idea behind is to allow value type objects to have null values just like reference types have. This concerns scenarios where not all data sources have values (like a databa…
Introduction Although it is an old technology, serial ports are still being used by many hardware manufacturers. If you develop applications in C#, Microsoft .NET framework has SerialPort class to communicate with the serial ports.  I needed to…
In this brief tutorial Pawel from AdRem Software explains how you can quickly find out which services are running on your network, or what are the IP addresses of servers responsible for each service. Software used is freeware NetCrunch Tools (https…
How to fix incompatible JVM issue while installing Eclipse While installing Eclipse in windows, got one error like above and unable to proceed with the installation. This video describes how to successfully install Eclipse. How to solve incompa…

721 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question