?
Solved

AppV - Application (.NET) is slower when sequenced

Posted on 2009-05-07
2
Medium Priority
?
1,427 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-21
I've recently sequenced an application (Morello Smart Client). This application requires .NET 2.0 SP1 and will be deployed on a citrix farm.

I sequenced the application on a machine with .NET 2.0 SP1 preinstalled. Also, my Citrix servers have .Net 2.0 SP1. Application appears to work fine.

When multiple users use the app however, some functions become really slow. Users have to wait minutes on actions that would take seconds normally.

After a day of troubleshooting we found the problem is with AppV. When we install the application directly on the citrix server all works fine and fast (also with multiple users).

I looked in the package to see if the app uses many virtualised directories, but it doesn't (except some .ico files). Same behaviour when only using RDP (not citrix).
What could be the cause of this behaviour? Any ideas would be appreciated.

We use the following environments:
MS Application Virtualisation 4.5
Citrix XenApp 4.5 on Windows 2003 Ent.
I also contact the supportdesk of the app but thay are of little help.
0
Comment
Question by:mrijn
1 Comment
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
JimboEfx earned 2000 total points
ID: 24335525
Hi There,

In order to understand the speed difference you need to understand the application at a deeper level to appreciate the issue.

In general capturing the activity of the application installed natively on one machine, and also when virtualised on another - compare and contrast. A common tool for this is process monitor. It is verbose but it does not lie.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/softgrid/archive/2008/01/24/process-monitor-hands-on-labs-and-examples.aspx

You will need to interpret the results in the context of the application.

In a recent experience, I found that a .NET application slowed down when the host .NET version was .NET2SP1, whereas .NET2 RTM was very close to native performance. Process monitor enabled me to see a very large amount of entries called 'Fusion'. This is a .NET logging facility - which was left on by the devs. Removing the appropriate reg key during sequencing resolved the issue.
0

Featured Post

When ransomware hits your clients, what do you do?

MSPs: Endpoint security isn’t enough to prevent ransomware.
As the impact and severity of crypto ransomware attacks has grown, Webroot has fought back, not just by building a next-gen endpoint solution capable of preventing ransomware attacks but also by being a thought leader.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Veeam Backup & Replication has added a new integration – Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365.  In this blog, we will discuss how you can benefit from Office 365 email backup with the Veeam’s new product and try to shed some light on the needs and …
August and September have been big months for VMware—from VMworld last month to our new Course of the Month in VMware Professional - Data Center Virtualization. We reached out to Andrew Hancock, resident VMware vExpert, to have a more in-depth discu…
In this video tutorial I show you the main steps to install and configure  a VMware ESXi6.0 server. The video has my comments as text on the screen and you can pause anytime when needed. Hope this will be helpful. Verify that your hardware and BIO…
Video by: ITPro.TV
In this episode Don builds upon the troubleshooting techniques by demonstrating how to properly monitor a vSphere deployment to detect problems before they occur. He begins the show using tools found within the vSphere suite as ends the show demonst…
Suggested Courses

862 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question