Best way, bar none, to search multiple hard drives for documents, keep the newest versions and remove older ones, and then

I have multiple hard drives.  Documents, photos, music, programs, backups, email, etc., in many places, sometimes on the same hard drive (sometimes different).  It is ALL jumbled around.
I have enough hard drives to put music, photos, home videos, etc., on their own hard drives.  Some of these are duplicate info as well.  

How should I merge duplicate data and then transfer everything to specific drives?... preferably quickly and cleanly.  (The faster the better.)

Is there software out there that assists with this?  What hardware might be recommended for the task?  Open to consider all options...
Who is Participating?

Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

CallandorConnect With a Mentor Commented:
There's SyncBack, which will let you synchronize files from different folders and lets you specify the target.  It has many options in its filters.  Nothing will match fibre channel, but for something more affordable, try hard drives installed in external enclosures with eSATA connections.
CanadianJeffAuthor Commented:
Sorry, forgot to go back and edit the title:
Best way, bar none, to collaborate multiple hard drives with numerous types of data, merge or remove duplicates, and move similar data to specific drives... what's the best way to do this using either available software or hardware?
Macros82Connect With a Mentor Commented:
Try something like Gaviri pocket search - its free runs remotely. It takes a while to index the documetns but it is quite granular and you can make exceptions on what it indexes
Building an Effective Phishing Protection Program

Join Director of Product Management Todd OBoyle on April 26th as he covers the key elements of a phishing protection program. Whether you’re an old hat at phishing education or considering starting a program -- we'll discuss critical components that should be in any program.

Macros82Connect With a Mentor Commented: get the free trial and have a go!
CanadianJeffAuthor Commented:
Great stuff, guys, thank you.  I'm still in process of determing which (maybe both!) to try/use.  I also had friend tell me to drag all data into one file, that will eliminate dup's, and I suppose he's right, too!  
Callandor, your recommendation for the hardware aspect actually supports a path I've already started down, so I'm glad to hear an expert like yourself say that.  I just got a SATA PCI controller card... that will help me get eSATA running, right?  
Oh, and I'm investigating Fibre Channel.... that sounds like the next wave, so something it'll be good to be aware of.  Thanks again guys!
>I just got a SATA PCI controller card... that will help me get eSATA running, right?

It will, if it has an external eSATA port.  You could also run an SATA cable from an interior port, but it will look ugly.

Fibre channel is a little expensive for personal use - it is mainly for servers and large storage devices.
CanadianJeffAuthor Commented:
It has two external ports.  They should specifically be eSATA ports, right?  What if they were SATA ports only?
Out of curiousity on Fibre Channel:  What might it cost to go North American wide for a company (and possibly even globally) to upgrade to Fibre Channel, do you have any idea?  It sounds like it's got a great ROI, because it solves alot of problems.
Thanks Callandor!
eSATA and SATA ports are exactly the same; the eSATA cable connector will be more rugged and may have a latch.

Fibre Channel is mostly used locally, such as within the same campus and competing with iSCSI.  You can probably go farther, but bandwidth drops with distance - see  As for cost, see this article:
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.