• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 341
  • Last Modified:

Recommended Exchange 2007 roles for two server environment

In an Exchange 2007 environment that will have only two physical servers, what is the recommended role placement?  (The only roles to be implemented are the minimum:  mailbox, HT, and CAS).

One server will have the mailbox role.
One server will have the CAS role.

Which server should have the hub transport?  Given that there is no clustering or redundancy, is there an advantage to combining the hub transport with one role over the other?


0
zmagick
Asked:
zmagick
  • 2
1 Solution
 
tligdaCommented:
In my experience, this situation calls for the Mailbox role to be on a server and the Hub and CAS roles on the other server. It's basically separating message storage from message transport and it makes for a very efficient architecture.

One of the most important things is to separate log file storage for the mailbox server from that for the Hub and CAS servers. This makes a huge improvement in efficiency.

Also, if your hub and CAS servers start to get overloaded, you can add more servers and load balance between them.
0
 
ms4lifeCommented:
Consider having Server1 handle all of the roles that will be used (Mailbox, HT, CAS).  Then use Server2 as an ISA/Forefront server in the DMZ.  That will offer additional security as the official MS recommendation is that Exchange servers should NOT be located in the DMZ.  And I try to avoid opening ports directly to servers on the LAN from the Internet.  

You should consider sizing the environment based on user count, number of message sent/received daily, projected database size, quota size, etc.  Because chances are you only need a single server for a small Exchange environment.  ISA/Forefront will allow you to secure all of the CAS services in addition to allowing you to publish other applications, web servers, etc.
0
 
zmagickAuthor Commented:
I didn't mention in the original post, but there is already a firewall and anti-malware appliance in place.  None of the Exchange roles would be in the DMZ, though the CAS would be reachable from the internet via a static NAT on the firewall.
0
 
ms4lifeCommented:
The firewall and anti-malware is good but doesn't take the place of ISA/Forefront.  The static NAT to the Exchange CAS server is against Best Practices, even more so with Exchange 2007.  That setup would be flagged in a security audit, compliance audit, or through Microsoft's assessment services.  I try to avoid that situation because if/when you call MS Support for an emergency, you're better off with a standard, Best Practices implementation that everybody is familiar with.  Just my opinion.
0

Featured Post

NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now