Solved

C++/CLI -- what about NULL?

Posted on 2009-05-08
6
1,155 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-06
Some of the code I'm upgrading to C++/CLI (.Net 2+) from Managed Extensions for C++ (.Net 1.1) compares an object to NULL or 0 to determine whether it's a null pointer.

But I'm getting a compile error on these lines.  
Cannot convert from 'int' to 'System::Drawing::Bitmap^'

Below is one of the functions in which I use the technique and get the error ... about 3 spots in this one.

What is the C++/CLI way to do this?

Thanks!
Bitmap ^ MyClass::LoadBMP(String ^fileName) {
 
		if(fileName == NULL || fileName == String::Empty) {                  // Make Sure A Filename Was Given
			return NULL;                                                    // If Not Return Null
		}
 
		// Make Sure The File Exists In One Of The Usual Directories
		if(!File::Exists(fileName)) {
			return NULL;                                                    // If Not Return Null
		}
 
		if(File::Exists(fileName)) {                                         // Does The File Exist Here?
			return gcnew Bitmap(fileName);                                    // Load The Bitmap
    }
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:Daniel Wilson
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 40

Accepted Solution

by:
evilrix earned 400 total points
ID: 24341069
Isn't the managed code version of NULL nullptr (or maybe just null) in managed C++?
0
 
LVL 2

Assisted Solution

by:Gregdo
Gregdo earned 100 total points
ID: 24341103
Yes, the managed version of NULL is nullptr.
0
 
LVL 32

Author Comment

by:Daniel Wilson
ID: 24341111
nullptr did it.  Thanks!
0
Efficient way to get backups off site to Azure

This user guide provides instructions on how to deploy and configure both a StoneFly Scale Out NAS Enterprise Cloud Drive virtual machine and Veeam Cloud Connect in the Microsoft Azure Cloud.

 
LVL 40

Expert Comment

by:evilrix
ID: 24341128
Thanks Gredo, I couldn't remember if it was null or nullptr. The problem is that microsoft have screwed up a bit here because as from C++0X nullptr will be the unmanaged C++ null pointer type :)
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:Gregdo
ID: 24341161
Ah, yes, I recall reading that nullptr will be replacing NULL.  I wonder if this will force MS to make a change!
0
 
LVL 40

Expert Comment

by:evilrix
ID: 24341190
>>  I wonder if this will force MS to make a change!
I hope so

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Null_pointer_constant
0

Featured Post

Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

832 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question