Solved

SET NOCOUNT OFF - how to capture returned messages

Posted on 2009-05-09
6
566 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
Suppose I SET NOCOUNT OFF in a stored procedure; I know it's not recommended, but just suppose that for a moment.

The stored procedure performs numerous deletes, updates, inserts. After each of those a message is returned to the caller (in this case ADO.NET) containing the number of records affected.

How do I capture, in ADO.NET, such returned messages (a large number of such messages) ??
0
Comment
Question by:campinam
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
6 Comments
 
LVL 75

Accepted Solution

by:
Aneesh Retnakaran earned 300 total points
ID: 24346650
you can use Output parameters to return the rows affected

create proc sample
@i int ,
@name varchar(10) ,
@rowsAffected1 int output,
@RowsAffected2 int output
as
SET NOCOUT ON

INSERT into....VALUES (... )
SET @RowsAffected1 = @@ROWCOUNT

UPDATE SomeTabel ...
SET @RowsAffected2 = @@ROWCOUNT
GO
0
 
LVL 143

Expert Comment

by:Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3]
ID: 24347000
I agree with that method being the best!
0
 

Author Comment

by:campinam
ID: 24347004
Thank you!
Can I capture the same info (rows affected) using SET NOCOUNT OFF and messages it returns (this was the point of my question) - how do I capture messages caused by SET NOCOUNT OFF (maybe that's not possible??)
0
Comprehensive Backup Solutions for Microsoft

Acronis protects the complete Microsoft technology stack: Windows Server, Windows PC, laptop and Surface data; Microsoft business applications; Microsoft Hyper-V; Azure VMs; Microsoft Windows Server 2016; Microsoft Exchange 2016 and SQL Server 2016.

 
LVL 143

Assisted Solution

by:Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3]
Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3] earned 100 total points
ID: 24347984
from what I know, that is indeed not possibly directly.
anyhow, as the parameter method is much easier to port to another database system, I would go that method anyway...
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
ID: 24348881
If you have SET NOCOUNT OFF you can use ExecteNonQuery to get the value, however it will only be the last one.
0
 
LVL 75

Assisted Solution

by:Anthony Perkins
Anthony Perkins earned 100 total points
ID: 24348900
And it would help if I could type.  It should be ExecuteNonQuery.  :)

I should have also stated that this only applies to INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE.  All other statements return -1.

And it should be clarified (in case it was not obvious) that if you have SET NOCOUNT ON then ExecuteNonQuery will not reurn any value.
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A company’s centralized system that manages user data, security, and distributed resources is often a focus of criminal attention. Active Directory (AD) is no exception. In truth, it’s even more likely to be targeted due to the number of companies …
Microsoft Access is a place to store data within tables and represent this stored data using multiple database objects such as in form of macros, forms, reports, etc. After a MS Access database is created there is need to improve the performance and…
Viewers will learn how the fundamental information of how to create a table.
Viewers will learn how to use the INSERT statement to insert data into their tables. It will also introduce the NULL statement, to show them what happens when no value is giving for any given column.

728 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question