Solved

Container for different primitive types and type casting

Posted on 2009-05-17
8
581 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-12
Using java 6, I want to create a class that will contain a two dimensional arrays of different types. It should work for int, double and boolean types, and it should have methods for getting this array as another type.

I tried doing this using generics, but I'm not sure if this is the best way. When using generics i'm not able to use primitive types. And when I use wrapper classes type casting is not that easy. I cannot cast from Integer to Double.

Any suggestions to how I can do this a better way?

public class ArrayContainer<T>
{
 
	protected T[][] array;
 
	public ArrayContainer( T[][] array)
	{
		this.array = array;
	}
 
	public T[][] getArray()
	{
		return array;
	}
 
	public void setArray( T[][] pattern )
	{
		this.pattern = pattern;
	}
	
	public Double[][] getArrayAsDouble()
	{
		if (arrayinstanceof Double[][])
		{
			return (Double[][]) array;
		}
		else if (array instanceof Integer[][])
		{
			return (IntegerToDouble(array));
		}
                .....
 
		return null;
	}
 
       public int getArraryAsInt()
       {
       }
	protected Double[][] IntegerToDouble(T[][] values) 
	{
	    ....
	}
	.....
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:jstakk
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
8 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 24405881
You can't cast arrays. You'd need to create an array of the correct type and copy the elements
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:jstakk
ID: 24405903
Yes I know. But I still can't cast each element directly from Integer to Double.

This should be done to very large arrays, so it has to be efficient.
Integer i = new Integer(1000);
Double d = (double) (int) i;

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:hazgoduk
ID: 24405910
You can do new Double(i) surely...?

Or you could have Class arrayClass = Object.class and have a setClass(Class class) method. Then just call setClass(Integer.class) and in your setValues you can check the values being entered are instanceof class
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
CEHJ earned 500 total points
ID: 24405928
I think perhaps you have something like this in mind (always trickyish but works)?
public class ArrayContainer<T> {
    protected T[][] array;
 
    public ArrayContainer(T[][] array) {
        this.array = array;
    }
 
    public T[][] getArray() {
        return array;
    }
 
    public void setArray(T[][] array) {
        this.array = array;
    }
 
    public Double[][] getArrayAsDouble() {
        Double[][] result = new Double[array.length][];
	for(int i = 0;i < result.length;i++) {	
	    result[i]  = new Double[array[i].length];
	    for(int j = 0;j < result[i].length;j++) {
		result[i][j] = ((Number)array[i][j]).doubleValue();
	    }
	}
        return result;
    }
 
    public static void main(String[] args) {	
	Integer[][] ii  = { 
	    { 1, 2, 3, 4 },
	    { 5, 6, 7, 8}
	};
	ArrayContainer ac = new ArrayContainer<Integer>(ii);
	Double[][] conv = ac.getArrayAsDouble();
	for (Double[] a : conv) {
	    System.out.println(java.util.Arrays.toString(a));
	}
    }
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:jstakk
ID: 24405955
@hazgoduk: The constructor for Double takes either a double, or a String as argument. Using an Integer in the constructor will work but it will call the Integer's toString() method and then parse the string. Not very efficient. Your second suggestion is perhaps a good way to go, i'll look into that. Thank you.

@CEHJ:
Thats what I was looking for. Looks like a good solution to my problem. I'm gonna try it out.

Thank you both very much for you quick and good help.
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 24405967
Why would you need a 'setClass' method?
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:hazgoduk
ID: 24405972
I must admit I didn't look at the code very much as I just woke up! You would indeed not need a setClass method. Just set the class based on the type sent in the contructor
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:CEHJ
ID: 24406381
:-)
0

Featured Post

SharePoint Admin?

Enable Your Employees To Focus On The Core With Intuitive Onscreen Guidance That is With You At The Moment of Need.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Software development teams often use in-memory caches to improve performance. They want to speed up access to, or reduce load on, a backing store (database, file system, etc.) by keeping some or all of the data in memory.   You should implement a…
Introduction This article explores the design of a cache system that can improve the performance of a web site or web application.  The assumption is that the web site has many more “read” operations than “write” operations (this is commonly the ca…
This video teaches viewers about errors in exception handling.
Viewers will learn how to properly install Eclipse with the necessary JDK, and will take a look at an introductory Java program. Download Eclipse installation zip file: Extract files from zip file: Download and install JDK 8: Open Eclipse and …
Suggested Courses

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question