Exchange 5.5.0 NDR - Never Seen Before
When Sending a an email from helpdesk@octree.co.uk to Jackie.Shea@asmeng.co.uk I get the below response. I have spent a lot of time working with exchange and know most of the NDRs but this one is new to me. Any Ideas
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: [Ticket #80] Updated: remote access problems
Sent: 18/05/2009 10:35
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
jackie.shea@asmeng.co.uk on 18/05/2009 10:37
There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.
<octree.co.uk #5.5.0 smtp;550 Error: rule body.05 contains a CIALIS variant dropping this.>
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: [Ticket #80] Updated: remote access problems
Sent: 18/05/2009 10:35
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
jackie.shea@asmeng.co.uk on 18/05/2009 10:37
There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.
<octree.co.uk #5.5.0 smtp;550 Error: rule body.05 contains a CIALIS variant dropping this.>
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
is your server exchange 2003 0r 2007 ?
is there any transport rule on the server?
disable it and then try sending mail
restart the transport service after disabling it
disable it and then try sending mail
restart the transport service after disabling it
ASKER
It seems that this was a problem with the firewall dropping traffic at the remote location. Thank you all for your repsonses.
he shoots, he scores ;)
seriously, one comment I would make is that I hope the domain names you posted are fictitious and not real ;) Never (ever) post real hostnames / IP's / domain names etc. Just in case ;)
seriously, one comment I would make is that I hope the domain names you posted are fictitious and not real ;) Never (ever) post real hostnames / IP's / domain names etc. Just in case ;)
Great ;-)
so may be some issue with them...