Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of GMBIT69
GMBIT69

asked on

How do I Bridge Linksys WET54G to a Cisco 1130AG?

I've got a WET54G.  I'm trying to create a bridge between that and the Cisco 1130AG.  At the bottom of my running config you can see that I have set the MAC Address of the WET54G (0023.695a.8b74) to be permitted.  Any thoughts on how to get this to work?
ap#show running-config
Building configuration...
 
Current configuration : 2851 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
!
hostname ap
!
!
aaa new-model
!
!
aaa group server radius rad_eap
!
aaa group server radius rad_mac
!
aaa group server radius rad_acct
!
aaa group server radius rad_admin
!
aaa group server tacacs+ tac_admin
!
aaa group server radius rad_pmip
!
aaa group server radius dummy
!
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication login eap_methods group rad_eap
aaa authentication login mac_methods local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa accounting network acct_methods start-stop group rad_acct
!
aaa session-id common
!
!
!
dot11 ssid Fuel Wi-Fi
   authentication open
   guest-mode
!
dot11 network-map
power inline negotiation prestandard source
!
!
username Cisco password 7 112A1016141D
username goldadmin privilege 15 password 7 072D331F6E0D1B550F405A4F
username 0023695a8b74 password 7 055B565D721A175C185D15455F
username 0023695a8b74 autocommand exit
!
bridge irb
!
!
interface Dot11Radio0
 no ip address
 no ip route-cache
 !
 encryption key 1 size 128bit 7 082164D55C3B588A148664AFCE80 transmit-key
 encryption mode wep mandatory
 !
 ssid Fuel Wi-Fi
 !
 speed  basic-1.0 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
 station-role root
 l2-filter bridge-group-acl
 bridge-group 1
 bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
 bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700
 bridge-group 1 output-address-list 700
 bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
 no bridge-group 1 source-learning
 no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
 bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
!
interface Dot11Radio1
 no ip address
 no ip route-cache
 shutdown
 !
 encryption key 1 size 128bit 7 7E6550EEF238BD9A5DC82F853B9A transmit-key
 encryption mode wep mandatory
 !
 ssid Fuel Wi-Fi
 !
 dfs band 3 block
 channel dfs
 station-role root
 l2-filter bridge-group-acl
 bridge-group 1
 bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
 bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700
 bridge-group 1 output-address-list 700
 bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
 no bridge-group 1 source-learning
 no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
 bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
!
interface FastEthernet0
 no ip address
 no ip route-cache
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 bridge-group 1
 no bridge-group 1 source-learning
 bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
!
interface BVI1
 ip address dhcp client-id FastEthernet0
 no ip route-cache
!
ip http server
ip http authentication aaa
no ip http secure-server
ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
ip radius source-interface BVI1
access-list 700 permit 0023.695a.8b74   0000.0000.0000
access-list 700 deny   0000.0000.0000   ffff.ffff.ffff
radius-server attribute 32 include-in-access-req format %h
radius-server vsa send accounting
bridge 1 route ip
!
!
!
line con 0
line vty 0 4
!
end
 
ap#

Open in new window

Avatar of willbaclimon
willbaclimon
Flag of United States of America image

I recommend using DD-WRT firemware for the linksys
Avatar of LitlJay
LitlJay

Never heard of a WET54G, myself.  Do you mean a WRT54G?  I'm with will.  Use DD-WRT, Tomato, or Thibor for your firmware to add the functions you seek.  I've never used DD-WRT, but Thibor lived in my WRT54G until Tomato recently replaced it.  They are both great; Tomato just has more toys and eye candy, and some parts of the interface are more friendly (but some are less).
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of GMBIT69
GMBIT69

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Ernie Beek
This question has been classified as abandoned and is closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See the recommendation for more details.