Which DR solution is better - Microsoft CCR or Xosoft Wansync HA for Exchange?

We currently use Xosoft Wansync HA for Exchange 2003 to replicate between the Main Site and DR site.

In a few months we are moving to Exchange 2007 on Windows 2008.

Which would be ideal for HA - Microsoft CCR or Xosoft Wansync?

At the moment, Xosoft has been perfect for us.
RBedewiAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraConnect With a Mentor Solutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
CCR has the features that even if the Site A is down we can get evrything up on site B.
This would mean that you would not have to spend money in a third party software.
0
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
CCR would be better
0
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
Put this in the search at google
CCR exchange 2007 windows 2008 and the first link is of MSExchange.org you cna have a look at that.
0
Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
Cluster Continuous Replication
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124521.aspx
You can also have videos at msexchangeteam blog
0
 
bakerm00Commented:
they key element here is supportability and at what level you feel is acceptable.
you should review http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895847
as with the rest of the answers, the preference would be CCR
CCR would be configured cross site for your purposes (geocluster), unless you are using SCR

you do not however make any statement on how many servers you have now and available budget as you will end up with an increase in servers deployed.
0
 
KaffiendCommented:
My take is if the budget allows, go with XoSoft (or other solutions like it - Mimosa, DoubleTake, to name a couple more)

They've been playing the continuous replication game for a while, and have had a couple of years now (since Exch 2007) to re-tool for the current version of Exchange, so their product is/should be solid.  Microsoft is only just coming into its own in this playing field, finally offering some of the features these guys have had.  (Don't forget that until Exch 2007 Service Pack 1, you couldn't even do CCR across the WAN)  For Exchange 2007, whether it is Microsoft or 3rd party, they are using a version of journaling for replication, the differentiator being what kind of other features/conveniences they offer besides the replication bit.  

That said, CCR is not a bad solution at all, and if you chose to go that route, you should still be able to rest easy at night.  





0
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
Any updates ?
0
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
Any updates on the issue ?
0
 
Manpreet SIngh KhatraSolutions Architect, Project LeadCommented:
Any updates on the issue ?
0
 
RBedewiAuthor Commented:
we are going with CCR :)
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.