• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 287
  • Last Modified:

Advice In site to site Topology

currently have a project in a new company .
My current Objective is to optmize resources in our company .

Present :
6 sites connected with VPN
each site with its own 2003 server ( AD, DNS, DHCP) , own ISA Server, own domain .
Each site has its own ADSL "internet" connection .

What i wanted:
exclude server infra-structure per site . Make all sites authenticate in the HQ via VPN ( by domain auth or terminal server ) , in only one DC, use only one ISA with only one ADSL Attached . Reason mainly, i see no point in having a server infra-structure in sites where only 3 employeers are working .

Questions :
is this possible ?
whats the best way to do this ? so i migrate users from one domain to another with not much trouble ?
should i auth users in remote DC or use local auth with remote Terminal server ?
what will be the cons about this ?


Any ideias, advices, new ways of optmizing resources are welcome .. will avcourse give the points to the most suitable response in my scenario .

thankz in advance,

0
lccviper
Asked:
lccviper
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
Chris DentPowerShell DeveloperCommented:

That sounds like, er.. fun? :)

Are any of the domains Small Business Server?

What kind of connection speeds do you have between sites? Centralising services might seem good, but if you have very low speed connections it may not work as well as you'd hope.

Chris
0
 
lccviperAuthor Commented:
just 2003 server standard .. connections between sites are 1Mb / 1 mb VPN in  IP MPLS ..

just particular interested in the best way to migrate users from local domains to the centralized one .
and whats the best way of doing this .. vpn with domain auth , or terminal services .


thankz in advance
0
 
Chris DentPowerShell DeveloperCommented:

Terminal Services may get quite expensive. You'd need a server powerful enough to provide concurrent sessions for each user, and you'd still have to provide them with hardware to be able to connect.

If you already have sufficient hardware for each end user I suspect moving to a single domain would make for an easier life. So I'd say VPN with domain Auth.

Given that these aren't SBS you can potentially use the Active Directory Migration Tool to shift them from the current domain to your centralised one. That would require you to form trusts between each domain, which in turn requires that they all have unique names.

Version 3 of ADMT can be found here:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6f86937b-533a-466d-a8e8-aff85ad3d212&displaylang=en

They've moved the documentation somewhere, hopefully it comes packaged with the installer.

Do you have any other systems involved? Exchange, for example?

The main disadvantage of centralisation like this is the dependence on a single site. Whether that matters depends on your network topology to an extent. If they're no good without the central site anyway then it's not much of a concern.

Chris
0
Simplify Active Directory Administration

Administration of Active Directory does not have to be hard.  Too often what should be a simple task is made more difficult than it needs to be.The solution?  Hyena from SystemTools Software.  With ease-of-use as well as powerful importing and bulk updating capabilities.

 
lccviperAuthor Commented:
thankz Chris .. seems some testing up front 1st :) .. Well, we are centralized at the moment, i just want to get rid of local domains per site, doesnt justify since theres some sites with 2 to 3 users :) .

- how will i manage DHCP in multiple sites ? for ex: Central Site where DHCP server is = 192.168.80.0 , site B =  192.168.20.0 . will dhcp recognize router ip and assign a ip in the correct scope ?


0
 
lccviperAuthor Commented:
oh , sorry , no exchange ..
0
 
Chris DentPowerShell DeveloperCommented:

If you want to centralise DHCP you'd use a SuperScope (which would contain a range for each office), each router would need a DHCP Helper configuring so that requests from the client site are passed back to the main site.

The range is matched up in the SuperScope based on the source IP address.

Of course if the connection is down they get no IP addressing either, which isn't much of a reason not to do it, but is something that should be considered.

Chris
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell┬« is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now