Advice on Roaming Profiles vs Group Policy for MyDocuments redirection

Hello,
I'd like some advice on how best to handle "My Documents" redirection on client PCs at a remote location which also has a local replica DC & file server.  My situation:

Location 1 - Main office:
Server1: Windows Small Business Server 2003 R2 (AD-DC, Exchange, SQL, file & print)
Users at Location1 have their MyDocuments automatically redirected to Server1 due to SBS2003 GPO.

new Location 2 - Warehouse:
Server2: Windows Server 2003 R2 (AD-DC replica, file & print)

There is a 0.5 Mbps VPN connection between location 1 & 2 - good enough for RDP, but not for 'dynamic' file access by applications at another location - way too slow for that.

I have an application & its data currently @ Location1/Server1.  I want to move it to Location2/Server2.

However SBS2003's standard GPOs redirect all domain-connected client PC user's My Documents to Server1.  Over a 0.5Mbps VPN that's unacceptably slow just logging in, let alone actually doing anything involving files in their MyDocs.

I could:
- modify GPO to apply MyDocs redirection to Server2 instead of Server1 for any/all Location2 PCs.  this seems like the best approach because it affects computers only, not users.

- use Roaming Profiles.
but Roaming Profiles are still stored in only 1 location, right?

Is there a 3rd option?

If i use Roaming Profiles, will the domain's MyDocs redirection GPO still redirect MyDocs to Server1 anyway?

I'm not very familiar with modifying GPOs, and am aware of many "horror stories" with Roaming Profiles, so I'm not sure where to focus my efforts (& further learning).

Many thanks for any advice,
Anthony.
techydude71Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Yes, there is a third option that will provide better performance AND a level of redundancy to protect your data from loss at either site.

1.  If you haven't already, properly configure Active Directory Sites and Services

Setup DFS with DFSR replication.  DFS will create a virtual share - for example, if you have:

Server1 = Server 1
Server2 = Server 2
MyDomain = Your NetBIOS domain name

Then DFS will allow you to define a share on Server1 and another share on Server2 that replicate with each other so that you have an identical set of data in both locations.  Then you define your share (where the folder redirection points to) as \\MyDomain\<Share Name> instead of \\Server1\<share name> or \\Server2\<share name>

DFS Replication can be configured to replicate off hours and to be throttled so that you don't use too much bandwidth when you might need it for other purposes.  Further, it replicates at the block level - meaning that if you have a 100 MB file and you make a small change to it, it ONLY replicates that small change, not the entire file - this means you can have the 100 MB file updated on both systems within seconds, EVEN on a 512 Kb VPN between sites (depending on your replication configuration).

More information can be found on DFS here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/storage/dfs/default.mspx
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
techydude71Author Commented:
That's brilliant!  Thanks heaps for the solution.  Sorry it took so long to get back to you.  Cheers, Anthony.
0
techydude71Author Commented:
One further question (I'm finally ready to get this happening),

My 'intuition' tells me that DFS would NOT be appropriate for use on Foxpro database files that are accessed simultaneously by multiple users?

I know that wasn't the scenario I posed originally (just user's home folders accessible only by themselves), I just want to clarify the limits of DFS's applicability...
0
techydude71Author Commented:
i just found the answer to my follow-up question, an unequivocal NO.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Active Directory

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.