PAM on Ubuntu

Dear Experts,

Does anyone here know how to use PAM on Ubuntu 8.04 to set permissions?  Apparently it is better to use PAM.  I have a shared computer and want to stop users looking at other users folders, settings, and temporary files.

Please help.
LVL 1
narmi2Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
fosiul01Connect With a Mentor Commented:
hmm
read the last bit

http://muzso.hu/2008/01/22/default-permissions-with-libpam-umask

Ok, now I got to use this in Hardy too. Smiling Found the problem: libpam_umask is no longer necessary since the required module is now in the libpam-modules package.


i dont use debain, so need to google it
0
 
fosiul01Commented:
this is the first time, i heard to use pam to restrict share from user!!

may be there is a way but i dont know ..

but why dont you use  , linux permission for that ??

if you can define accurate permission for user, groups and insert user into those groups, your pupose would be solved

have you tryed with that ??
0
 
Let_Me_BeCommented:
You seem to be a bit confused. PAM is authentication pluggable tool not a tool to set permissions. What you are looking for is probably ACL (although the actual need to use ACLs is very rare, 99% cases can be solved with simple Unix access rights).
0
Get expert help—faster!

Need expert help—fast? Use the Help Bell for personalized assistance getting answers to your important questions.

 
narmi2Author Commented:
According to the documentation in login.defs, I do want to use PAM

# UMASK usage is discouraged because it catches only some classes of user
# entries to system, in fact only those made through login(1), while setting
# umask in shell rc file will catch also logins through su, cron, ssh etc.
#
# At the same time, using shell rc to set umask won't catch entries which use
# non-shell executables in place of login shell, like /usr/sbin/pppd for "ppp"
# user and alike.
#
# Therefore the use of pam_umask is recommended as the solution which
# catches all these cases on PAM-enabled systems.
#
# This avoids the confusion created by having the umask set
# in two different places -- in login.defs and shell rc files (i.e.
# /etc/profile).
0
 
fosiul01Commented:
from bellow, which line  makes you think that pum can crontall share ??

------------
According to the documentation in login.defs, I do want to use PAM

# UMASK usage is discouraged because it catches only some classes of user
# entries to system, in fact only those made through login(1), while setting
# umask in shell rc file will catch also logins through su, cron, ssh etc.
#
# At the same time, using shell rc to set umask won't catch entries which use
# non-shell executables in place of login shell, like /usr/sbin/pppd for "ppp"
# user and alike.
#
# Therefore the use of pam_umask is recommended as the solution which
# catches all these cases on PAM-enabled systems.
#
# This avoids the confusion created by having the umask set
# in two different places -- in login.defs and shell rc files (i.e.
# /etc/profile).


are you thiking of umask ??
0
 
narmi2Author Commented:
This whole thread makes me think I should be using PAM:

http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=33979
0
 
Let_Me_BeCommented:
Could you explain what you actually need help with? You don't know how to switch to PAM or you need help with UMASK?
0
 
narmi2Author Commented:
According to the link above, you can centerally set umask using pam.  but when I try to install pam i.e. libpam_umask, it wants to remove the kernel from ubuntu.

So basically, I need help with setting up and installing pam in general.
0
 
fosiul01Commented:
Ok so its about umask, its nothign to do with pam

if you read that article, you will see, there is some section, tis said to use chmod command to restrict control

if you want to know about umask

http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/understanding-linux-unix-umask-value-usage.html

umask, is suppose , if you want want a system that , when a user will create a directory or file, it will be automaticaly set a certain permission, then you can setup umask . so it will apply with every file and directory

read that
0
 
narmi2Author Commented:
yes, but according to that article, it seems you cannot set umask centerally without pam.  without pam you have to make changes in more than one config file.
0
 
narmi2Author Commented:
yes, that is the problem i am having, it wants to remove the whole system...  ok so now I know it's in libpam_modules, I will try installing that and see if I can set umask centerally.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.