ASA 5510 vs Sonicwall for small business

I am looking at firewalls right now, and have some experience with them, but not nearly enough as I should have for purchasing one. I am hoping to get some opinions.

I have a small business with about 10 employees. I will have one site to site VPN and 1 or 2 client VPNs.  I have some programs that I want to prioritize in bandwidth. I would also like to have content security and posibly intrusion prevention as well.  I have been looking at an ASA 5510 and a NSA 240.  

The ASA 5510 seems to be able to handle more than I will need, but it didnt look like the ASA 5505 would have all of the features that I was looking for.  The NSA 240 seems to have everthing that I was looking for but the content security and intrusion prevention seem to be software based and slower, although for my needs are fine. Additionally I can get a NFR NSA 240 so I can get it much cheaper than either an ASA 5505 or 5510.

Anyone have any input on which they prefer? Strengths or weaknesses for either?

LVL 12
ryan80Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Rick FeeMessaging Engineer - Disaster Recovery EngineerCommented:
 I prefer Sonicwalls because I worked for a company that is a reseller.     Cisco ASA series are excellent devices also.    I like the Sonicwall line because their admin interface is web only...you don't have to deal with a java install.     For a small business I'm not sure if you would see any performance issues on either.    Sonicwall being slightly less expensive I would go with that model.     In addition getting in though with their support is easy and fast.     Then again I have only worked with Cisco support once or two but it was not the easiest to get connected.  
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Boilermaker85Commented:
I have worked with many firewalls (Cisco pix/asa, Checkpoint, Sonicwall, Watchguard, Symantec, etc) and I admit I am biased toward Cisco. They have both command line and java-GUI admin interface. I still use the cmdline mostly. THe Sonicwall may be cheaper though. YOu can get deep discounts from Cisco resellers if you are a large company, but small companies might expect a 25-30% discount over list. It still might be more expensive than Sonicwall. I've never done content security on a Sonicwall or IPS, but even if they are software-based, with a 10 user environment Plus 3 VPNs, the 240 should handle it without any noticable delay. Cisco's support is the best, But Sonicwall was responsive and their KB was growing the last time I was there. So if you are comfortable with their support, their interface, and pricing, go for the Sonicwall.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Software Firewalls

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.