Solved

DMZ Name Resolution Best Practice

Posted on 2009-07-01
1
1,737 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-07
Hello, my question is more of a design/best practice question, no real issue...

What is the best way to configure DNS/name resolution for servers in the DMZ for both internal name resolution as well as external resolution.

I'll start with Internal:  If you have an application that needs access to a specific service behind the firewall, say for example a DB server.  It obviously isn't best practice to use/hard code an IP address for the DB server in the configuration of the application needing access to the DB server so you are stuck with DNS name.  Somehow we need to resolve the DNS name to an IP.  Is it better to use the hosts file or use some type of DNS server?  If DNS is the best method is it better to have a DNS server in the DMZ that houses a zone copy of internal records or is it better to pinhole the firewall and give access to an internal DNS server?

External:
Use a DNS server in the DMZ that will perform recursive lookups or use an all together external server to perform the recursive lookups?

Any help would be greatly appreciated....

Blake
0
Comment
Question by:isoperations
1 Comment
 
LVL 25

Accepted Solution

by:
Ron M earned 500 total points
ID: 24756390
Well let's start with the purpose of the DMZ.

We put those servers there to segreggate them from the network.  In the event they are comprimised, they do not have full access to the network.  As far as a router/firewall is concerned, it's a seperate network entity.

That being said.... we might not want the dmz servers to be able to resolve all the internal hosts...just the ones they need to function and communicate with directly.

You could give the server access to your internal dns servers through firewall rules....but some might construe that as a  weakening the restrictive purpose of the dmz.

In most cases, people need some traffic types to be able to traverse the dmz, (often times SQL)...but the best practice is to only do it when there is no other solution.

The idea of having another dns server, zone copy, is basically the same thing...unless you manage exactly what records are in the zone.

In short...if there are only a few hosts it needs to contact directly, then I would use a host file, or don't use hostname mappings but rather IP address for everything.  It's usually the pinhole that gets exploited first....so avoid it if you can.
0

Featured Post

3 Use Cases for Connected Systems

Our Dev teams are like yours. They’re continually cranking out code for new features/bugs fixes, testing, deploying, testing some more, responding to production monitoring events and more. It’s complex. So, we thought you’d like to see what’s working for us.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Resolve DNS query failed errors for Exchange
When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

867 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

21 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now