Denun
asked on
general info/conversation about virtual and cluster
let's say that i need to save some money and i can't buy new clients, i think a good answer for this could be virtualization.
- if i understand well my client can boot with a free os and log on on a virtual machine that run win xp, using the performance of the server and not the performance of the client.
that's a good thing (if works like this) the problem is that is very difficult to plan how many virtual machine can hold one single server.
now let's say that i have 3 identical physical server, can i configure them (using windows server 2008 rc2) to act as only one to improve performance?
my goal is to have just one powerful windows server to host different virtual virtual server on top of it (look the picture).
ok, i made some assumption but i really don't know where i'm wrong or where i'm right, can you talk about it?
hypothetical.jpg
- if i understand well my client can boot with a free os and log on on a virtual machine that run win xp, using the performance of the server and not the performance of the client.
that's a good thing (if works like this) the problem is that is very difficult to plan how many virtual machine can hold one single server.
now let's say that i have 3 identical physical server, can i configure them (using windows server 2008 rc2) to act as only one to improve performance?
my goal is to have just one powerful windows server to host different virtual virtual server on top of it (look the picture).
ok, i made some assumption but i really don't know where i'm wrong or where i'm right, can you talk about it?
hypothetical.jpg
ASKER
helps a lot a thx, but saying that i have just 20-30 clients to connect as a virtual machine how do u suggest i can achieve a balancing/performance setup to keep running other service?
- pdc
- fileserver
- exchange
- pdc
- fileserver
- exchange
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
i saw the license and for my needs cost only 3,600$ i think if i can achieve my goal is worth it, even if vmware is intended for large business.
za mkh, pls follow me in other question i will made, bcose now that i understand the general concept i need more pratical advise on it.
za mkh, pls follow me in other question i will made, bcose now that i understand the general concept i need more pratical advise on it.
What you can do is pool the resources together in a slightly different way.
In VMWare Terms, this is called a Cluster. Activating features like DRS (Dynamic Resource Scheduling) and HA (High Availalbility) and even DPM (Distributed Power Management) on this cluster means that the total power/memory becomes the net effect of all your servers.
So if you had 3 servers each with 10GB RAM and 10GHz Processing power, your cluster would have 30GB RAM and 30GHz Processing power. DRS,HA,DPM then take over and move over VM's across the servers depending on resource rules, etc. But a VM will run on 1 of those physical machines at any given time.
Here is a more in-depth overview: http://www.petri.co.il/vmw
Hope this helps..