Solved

EIGRP variance question

Posted on 2009-07-06
8
407 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
For the attached diagram, if variance has been configured on Router 4 to 2, can I say that only "4-5-6" and "4-7-8" will participate in load sharing ? The shortest FD is "4-5-6", with FD = 10 and AD = 5 (from Router5).  AD from Router 3 is 10 which couldn't be a feasible succesor for Router 4 as its FD (10) = AD (10) from router 3. Hence, it couldn't be added as feasilble successor and it don't have any benefit with variance. Am I correct ?

Thanks
EIGRP.bmp
0
Comment
Question by:AXISHK
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
8 Comments
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24784015
Looks like 4-5-6 has an FD of 10.
0
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:Robert Sutton Jr
ID: 24786950
Agreed. And I also concur with what Djohnston said above.   =10
0
 

Author Comment

by:AXISHK
ID: 24790907
Hi,

My conern is

On R4
  through  R3: FD (20) AD (10)
  through  R5: FD (10) AD(5)
  through  R7: FD (15) AD(5)

So on R4, through R5 will be the successor, and through R7 will be feasible successor. R3 wouldn't be the feasbile successor as its AD (10) is not smaller than the successor (FD=10). If I add varience 2 on R3, both R5 and R7 will have load balancing.

However, should I need to consider R2 ? R2 has FD(5) and AD(0) ? If I take it into the consideration, R2 will also fullfill the requirement as its AD(0) is smaller than the successor (FD(10).  But R2 is behind R3, so can I say only R3 will be considered ?

Thanks.
0
Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24791006
> If I add varience 2 on R3, both R5 and R7 will have load balancing.

Huh?

If you set the variance on R3 to 2, then R3 will use R2 and R4 as equal cost paths to the corp network. This could create some interesting behavior when R3 send a packet to R4 who then sends it right back to R3 (routing loop).
0
 

Author Comment

by:AXISHK
ID: 24791066
Sorry, typo mistake. Variance should set on Router4. So, by putting the variance on R4, only "4-5-6" and "4-7-8" will participate in load sharing, correct ?

0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24791087
I think 4-3-2 will also be used. The idea is that since 10 is the FD, a variance of 2 makes the target FD 20. Any paths 20 or better are now considered equal.

That said, I've never tested it since usually the metrics are 6 digits or more and getting one that close is pretty unusual.
0
 

Author Comment

by:AXISHK
ID: 24791186
Before adding the variance would path "4-3-2" be a feasible successor for Router 4 ?

0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 500 total points
ID: 24793229
Since the AD is not greater than the FD of the successor, yes.
0

Featured Post

Manage your data center from practically anywhere

The KN8164V features HD resolution of 1920 x 1200, FIPS 140-2 with level 1 security standards and virtual media transmissions at twice the speed. Built for reliability, the KN series provides local console and remote over IP access, ensuring 24/7 availability to all servers.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
null0 7 69
unable to set full duplex 100 on WAN interface 11 96
Home internet speed 20 56
Access points not passing on DHCP, because of Draytek PoE Switch (VLAN related) 18 84
We've been using the Cisco/Linksys RV042 for years as: - an internet Gateway - a site-to-site VPN device - a leased line site-to-site subnet-to-subnet interface (And, here I'm assuming that any RV0xx behaves the same way as an RV042.  So that's …
In the world of WAN, QoS is a pretty important topic for most, if not all, networks. Some WAN technologies have QoS mechanisms built in, but others, such as some L2 WAN's, don't have QoS control in the provider cloud.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

737 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question