We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Check out our new AWS podcast with Certified Expert, Phil Phillips! Listen to "How to Execute a Seamless AWS Migration" on EE or on your favorite podcast platform. Listen Now

x

Deleting child table foreignkey entire row on delete in SQL 2008

Medium Priority
266 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-07
Hello,

I have a table Courses which contains 1 field : CN
The other table is ADCourseMapping with 4 fields: ID, CN, SC, ADSG
I have a relationship constraint using Courses.CN as primary key to validate entries in ADCourseMapping.
I have setup the relationship to cascade on update, and cascade on delete.
However, when deleting an entry from Courses.CN, only the corresponding ADCourseMapping.CN field gets deleted. I'm actually interested in removing the whole row, as it would be no longer valid.
Is there any easy way to do this?

Please keep in mind that I have never done any SQL procedures, if accomplishing this involves using a procedure, please be as details as possible.

TiA!
Georges
Comment
Watch Question

Top Expert 2009

Commented:
Sounds like the ON DELETE is executing a SET NULL or SET DEFAULT rather than CASCADE. Can you show your DDL?

Author

Commented:
well .. at least from where I'm looking at it, it doesn't sound like it, but maybe there's something I'm missing. Here's the DDL.
USE [UserNameStore]
GO
 
/****** Object:  Table [dbo].[ADCourseMapping]    Script Date: 07/08/2009 12:29:00 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
 
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
 
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
 
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ADCourseMapping](
	[ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
	[CN] [varchar](6) NOT NULL,
	[SC] [int] NOT NULL,
	[ADSG] [varchar](50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
 
GO
 
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO
 
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ADCourseMapping]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_ADCourseMapping_Courses] FOREIGN KEY([CN])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Courses] ([CN])
ON UPDATE CASCADE
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
 
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ADCourseMapping] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_ADCourseMapping_Courses]
GO
 
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ADCourseMapping]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_ADCourseMapping_SchoolMapping] FOREIGN KEY([SC])
REFERENCES [dbo].[SchoolMapping] ([SC])
ON UPDATE CASCADE
ON DELETE CASCADE
GO
 
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ADCourseMapping] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_ADCourseMapping_SchoolMapping]
GO
 
 
=============================================
USE [UserNameStore]
GO
 
/****** Object:  Table [dbo].[Courses]    Script Date: 07/08/2009 12:29:08 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
 
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
 
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
 
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Courses](
	[CN] [varchar](6) NOT NULL,
 CONSTRAINT [PK_Courses_1] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED 
(
	[CN] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
 
GO
 
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO

Open in new window

Top Expert 2009
Commented:
Unlock this solution with a free trial preview.
(No credit card required)
Get Preview

Author

Commented:
That's very interesting. On mine here's an example record in Courses:
CN
5874

An example record in ADCourseMapping
ID   CN      SC      ADSG
1    5874    103    103-Business

I delete the 5874 record from Course, and I end up with the following on the corresponding ADCourseMapping record:
ID    CN     SC     ADSG
1                103   103-Business

Funny thing is, though this field has a not-null constraint, when it cascades the deletion of that particular field, the table seems ok with a NULL value. Of course, the field doesn't say "NULL" , so it may not actually be NULL as far as the table constraint is concerned.

Author

Commented:
Ok ... you know , never mind, this is all my fault, and you were absolutely correct. What I did to test the constraint was actually delete the value of the CN, but never deleted the row, and that's why it reflected only the field deletion in the child table. I just retried it, and deleted the whole row, and the corresponding child table row got deleted as well.

Oh well.. I'll blame this on being an SQL noob ;-)

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction though! the points are yours.
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a free trial preview!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.