We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Make a local ACCESS 2003 db run faster

259 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-25
I have a client that users ACCESS 2003 on local machines.  Problem is that they are processing MILLIONS of records.  They have so many that they have created a series of databases that hold only one table - which can be up to 5 million records.  So, the "processing" database has links to all these "child" databases but queries can take an incredibly long time.  The machine has almost 20 Gig of free space and 2.5 gig of ram.  They DO NOT want to put anything on a SQL server (my FIRST suggestion).  Tables are indexed, but would more ram help?  I am at my wits' end as these people will not change but also insist it should run faster.  Speed is 2992 MHz. XProfessional, SVP 3.  I have contacted their IT department and first thing out of their mouths was put in on a SQL server.  I just want confirmation that there is nothing that can be done to get the application to "run faster".
Comment
Watch Question

Senior .Net Developer
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
Scott McDaniel (EE MVE )Infotrakker Software
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2012
Top Expert 2014
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
DatabaseMX (Joe Anderson - Microsoft Access MVP)Database Architect / Application Developer
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2007

Commented:
'between keyboard and the chair" ... =  vacuum ?

mx

Commented:
Definitely a short between the seat and the keyboard.
Sandra SmithRetired

Author

Commented:
NO THEY ARE NOT, I REPEAT NOT backing up!  I backup everything so they will have a backup when I leave (as well as my own shell of the database).  There is no old data as it is all live and accumulates during the year, at year end, all is cleaned out and they strart over again.  
Yes, it is a problem between the chair and keyboard.  I am dealing with two very arrogant men who think no one could possibly know anything, including neither me nor the IT department.  Of couse, the lady I am working for does not know anything either, but it is not her job to,  and they keep telling her that all I need is a "better" machine.  I just wanted to be sure I was not missing anything in case there may be an option, but it looks like you both only confirmed what I thought.  At least got a copy on the shared directory that is backed up, but can do nothing about their local drives.  They even refuse to listen to suggestions about improving what they have, so I have given up and am doing it "their" way.  I am going to split points as there was really no "answer" but only a request for confirmation of what I thought.  
Scott McDaniel (EE MVE )Infotrakker Software
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2012
Top Expert 2014

Commented:
I'd certainly send that email ... you really should cover your butt and make sure that, when this thing falls over (and it will) you can prove that you made EVERY effort to safeguard the data and were roundly ignored. Could be the difference between who gets the big pink paper ...
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.