Solved

VMWare Memory Issue with Heavy SQL Server queries

Posted on 2009-07-10
6
344 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-07
Scenario: We have 2 guest systems one is a file sharing server, and the other is a SQL server. Both systems, have memory allocated, and are attached to a SAN.



Problem: We are running intense queries to this SQL Server also we are importing information from files that are located on the File Server into a SQL database that is located on another ESX server.

Issue:
What we are seeing is the file that we are trying to import into our SQL database *(SQL Server is located on a Different ESX Server).
Is getting Information injected from the intense query.

NOTE: The only file with the injected information is the one that is being loaded into memory.

If we reboot the File Server we can go back and check the file in question and see that the file will no longer have the injected information.

We can also stop all queries and imports and only execute the queries. Once the memory block, for which the file that has the injected information gets over written, we can then open the file in question and see that the injected information will no longer be there.

Has anyone seen this before any help would be great?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:Phytech Admin
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
6 Comments
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:vmwarun - Arun
ID: 24828533
How have you configured your LUNs ? Is the LUN visible to both ESX Hosts ?
0
 

Author Comment

by:Phytech Admin
ID: 24829087
Yes, LUNs are configured for Both ESX servers, the imported flat-files are being read from the LUN on the files server. We are runing iSCSI with SATA Drives
0
 

Author Comment

by:Phytech Admin
ID: 24829104
I failed to mention that the 2 Guest OS Systems are located on the same ESX Server.
The server, where we are running the import from is on another SQL Server, importing into a different database. This SQL server is located on another ESX Server.

So that theres no confusion, file means flat-files i.e. (row of data)

Please let me know if i need to put more information.
Thanks
0
NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:za_mkh
ID: 24829292
I don't know what you are talking about specifically, but have you reindexed your DBs recently? That normally sorts out speed issues (well I'm a SQL noob) but it works for our SQL servers. We don't have issues like what you mention though.
Also have you followed best practices for configuring SQL in VM?
http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-8964
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966534.aspx
Another thing is that I think you may be hitting an IO limit with your storage (ISCSI with SATA). SATA itself is not great for heavy loads, proven, though it works. It depends on how your underlying storage on which your VMFS volume is configured, ex how many spindles, etc.
Do you have dedicated NICs on your ESX Hosts for ISCSI traffic (with hopefully a dedicated switch for ISCSI traffic) or are all your guests and server sharing the same NIC ports, etc ... this could also be another area to look at.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Phytech Admin
ID: 24833089
We have dedicated NICs on the ESX hosts for ISCSI traffic and a dedicated switch,
all are guests are using one nic for the data network traffic they are not connected to the iSCSI network.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Phytech Admin earned 0 total points
ID: 25180817
Each port on the storage processor is considered a target.
 
For example  a0 and b0 are on 192.168.1.1 network
If  a1 and b1 are on the same 192.168.1.1 subnet then a1 target becomes an initiator
and tries to log into the a0 port now we have a loop that is ping ponging the port up and down .
 
Now if we have 2 subnets per pair
 
A0 and B0 are on 192.168.1.1
And A1 and B1 are on 192.168.2.1
Then we have no conflicts target versus initiator.
0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Veeam Backup & Replication has added a new integration – Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365.  In this blog, we will discuss how you can benefit from Office 365 email backup with the Veeam’s new product and try to shed some light on the needs and …
This article outlines why you need to choose a backup solution that protects your entire environment – including your VMware ESXi and Microsoft Hyper-V virtualization hosts – not just your virtual machines.
Teach the user how to configure vSphere Replication and how to protect and recover VMs Open vSphere Web Client: Verify vsphere Replication is enabled: Enable vSphere Replication for a virtual machine: Verify replicated VM is created: Recover replica…
Advanced tutorial on how to run the esxtop command to capture a batch file in csv format in order to export the file and use it for performance analysis. He demonstrates how to download the file using a vSphere web client (or vSphere client) and exp…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question