Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 254
  • Last Modified:

Public Folders replicates less than half of the store

Good evening,

I am about to move over to Exchange 2007 from our 2003 environment. The new servers are setup, and seems to be working good.

I started to replicate our public folder store (2003) over to the new 2007 server, and performed the following steps:
1. Propagate all folders with replication to the new 2007 server with adsiedit
2. Resend settings with replication to "Always Run"

There is around 5-600 folders in total, and the file-size on the old 2003 server showis 75gb. (Eventid shows 1gb of free space in the db). I started the replication 4 days ago, and it started almost right away. The next morning, the db-files on the new server showed 29gb. When i check in ESM, replication status shows In Sync, local modified and both modified randomly on the folders.

I knew the size wouldnt be exact the same, but the difference is huge. So i've put on my detective hat and started an investigation. But i cant seem to find any good reason. Ive added maximal logging on replication on the 2003 server. But still, i dont see any errors. BPA doesnt give me anything useful either.

I have moved 40% of my users to the new servers, so i dont want to use the MoveReplica script since there will still be users on the 2003 system for now. (The rest will be moved within a week).

Any idea on where to troubleshoot ?
0
jjugland
Asked:
jjugland
  • 2
1 Solution
 
HayesJupeCommented:
so the easiest way to check if thats your real database (which it probably is) - take the 2003 public folder db ofline, use eseutil to do an offline defrag.
my guess is, that after a defrag, you'll find the space difference isnt very much at all.
0
 
MesthaCommented:
Ignore size. There are many reasons why the size can be different.
The only valid test is that item count.

Compare the output of get-publicfolderstatistics with what ESM shows.

I wouldn't do an offline defrag, I couldn't justify the three days of downtime.

Simon.
0
 
jjuglandAuthor Commented:
Thanks for reply guys.

Offline defrag is currently off the table, hence the downtime. But is there a way to get the full count of itmes? get-publicfolderstatistics shows me items for each folder, but theres 5-600 folders. So I would have to compare the folders one-by-one?
0
 
MesthaCommented:
Unfortunately, comparing them one by one is the only option.
It is the only accurate way of knowing.
I have often exported the results to a CSV file and then exported the ESM results in to another CSV file and brought the two lists together to make it easier.

As you are going to a new database, the size cannot be compared.

Simon.
0

Featured Post

Fill in the form and get your FREE NFR key NOW!

Veeam is happy to provide a FREE NFR server license to certified engineers, trainers, and bloggers.  It allows for the non‑production use of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows. This license is valid for five workstations and two servers.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now