paintco
asked on
What is the difference between inside and outside Nat ?
What is the difference between inside and outside Nat ?
when shall I use the outside nat or inside nat?
when shall I use the outside nat or inside nat?
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
RTR-A connected to RTR-B through PSTN using BGP routing
Site -A LAN connected to Core-A and Core-A connected to RTR-A
Site -B LAN connected to Core-B and Core-B connected to RTR-B
Site -A LAN connected to Core-A and Core-A connected to RTR-A
Site -B LAN connected to Core-B and Core-B connected to RTR-B
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
RTR-A Fa0/1 going to Core-A
RTR-A Se 0/1 going to MPLS cloud
RTR-B Fa0/1 going to Core-B
RTR-B Se 0/1 going to MPLS cloud
no NAT applied anywhere
only I want to apply Nat on all traffic going and coming for each LAN router interface
RTR-A Se 0/1 going to MPLS cloud
RTR-B Fa0/1 going to Core-B
RTR-B Se 0/1 going to MPLS cloud
no NAT applied anywhere
only I want to apply Nat on all traffic going and coming for each LAN router interface
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
thanks
What will be the situation if I want to implement NAT on Core switches as followed
Site-A All clients NAT to --> 17.0.10.50
Site-B All clients NAT to --> 17.10.20.50
Site-A server-1 10.1.1.100 --> NAT to 170.10.100
Site-A server-2 10.1.1.101 --> NAT to 17.0.10.101
Site-B server-1 20.1.1.100 --> NAT to 17.0.20.100
Site-B server-2 120.1.1.101 -- NAT to 17.0.20.101
What will be the situation if I want to implement NAT on Core switches as followed
Site-A All clients NAT to --> 17.0.10.50
Site-B All clients NAT to --> 17.10.20.50
Site-A server-1 10.1.1.100 --> NAT to 170.10.100
Site-A server-2 10.1.1.101 --> NAT to 17.0.10.101
Site-B server-1 20.1.1.100 --> NAT to 17.0.20.100
Site-B server-2 120.1.1.101 -- NAT to 17.0.20.101
ASKER
if core platform is 6550 does it will fit and if there are around 50 server need to be nat one to one does it will be headache
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
thanks alot
no problem
ASKER
routing between two LANs of the two sites is ok both LANs are reachable from each other
there are two servers in each site
Site-A server-1 10.1.1.100/24
Site-A server-2 10.1.1.101/24
Site-B server-1 20.1.1.100/24
Site-B server-2 20.1.1.101/24
I want to NAT the traffic between the two sites as follow
Site-A All clients NAT to --> 172.16.1.50
Site-B All clients NAT to --> 172.16.2.50
Site-A server-1 10.1.1.100 --> NAT to 172.16.1.100
Site-A server-2 10.1.1.101 --> NAT to 172.16.1.101
Site-B server-1 20.1.1.100 --> NAT to 172.16.2.100
Site-B server-2 120.1.1.101 -- NAT to 172.16.2.101
All workstations and servers should be reachable from each other
Open in new window