Solved

Firebox x750e changing port forwarding

Posted on 2009-07-14
8
1,671 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
I am changing the a port forwarding rule and create a second new port forwarding rule on a Firebox X750e at one of our offices.  I am not familiar with watchguards.  I simply want to make a rule to forward 5900 to internal address 192.168.1.247.

We have a single external public IP address connected to the WAN port of the firebox.  There are several standard port forwarding rules pointing to 2 servers already.  I attempted to model my new rule off of these and cahnge the existing RDP rule.

I have made the change a dozen times and cannot figure out why it does not work.  for a test I took an existing rule forwarding RDP 3389 to 192.168.1.225 that is working and changed the NAT setting to 192.168.1.247.  Same rule, same settings and it doesn't work!  Change it back and it works with the original .225 server.  Internally that system is up and accessible on both protocols.

I am guessing that there is another place that a NAT setting or the .247 host must be defined, but I can't find it or find it mentioned in any directions.  
0
Comment
Question by:mathews2001
  • 4
  • 3
8 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:jmlamb
Comment Utility
Hello,

1-to-1 NAT is configured in Policy Manager under Network, NAT, 1-to-1 NAT tab. You should find your existing public to 192.168.1.225 configuration there.

Hope that gets you going in the right direction.
0
 

Author Comment

by:mathews2001
Comment Utility
The 1 to 1 NAT tab is blank.  I understood that the NAT settings under the policy itself take priority over this tab.  I think when you make a policy and use the NAT button it creates a 1 to 1 for you.

I can add a setting there, but it didnt help before.
0
 

Author Comment

by:mathews2001
Comment Utility
I tried to add a 1 to 1 NAT and got the following message:

You cannot use an interface IP address (primary or Secondary) of the firebox in your 1 to 1 NAT configuration.

The NAT base was x.x.x.x my external IP and the real base was my internal 192.168.1.247
0
 

Author Comment

by:mathews2001
Comment Utility
reversed the NAT base and real base above and it took the setting.  doesnt look right to me though.
0
Control application downtime with dependency maps

Visualize the interdependencies between application components better with Applications Manager's automated application discovery and dependency mapping feature. Resolve performance issues faster by quickly isolating problematic components.

 
LVL 32

Accepted Solution

by:
dpk_wal earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
As you have only one public IP you cannot use 1-1 NAT.

Please ensure that the new machine is actually listening on the ports you are configuring in the service [you can use netstat -a command to verify the port/protocol].

Also, make sure on the new machine internal IP of WG is the default gateway and there no multiple gateways; finally make sure there is no internal firewall on the new machine which is blocking the traffic.

If you enable logging for the service and post few sanitized logs from traffic when the traffic goes though it would be helpful.

Please update.

Thank you.
0
 

Author Comment

by:mathews2001
Comment Utility
The listening pc had the wrong default gateway.  We typically use .1 and this office has .254.  I always tell the guys to check the simple stuff first.  I guess I didn't take my own advice.  What was killing me was the logs showed it forwarding, but not working.  
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:jmlamb
Comment Utility
You were trying to create it correctly the first time, but was using an IP already assigned to an interface, which won't work. Go ahead and delete that 1-to-1 if you haven't already.

In the inbound RDP policy you're trying to modify, under the Policy tab, what does it say in the To box? You should see public ip --> private ip. The private ip should be 192.168.1.247. Under the Advanced tab, make sure Dynamic NAT is checked. You don't have to setup a 1-to-1 with a single public ip.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:jmlamb
Comment Utility
Oops, didn't see this as solved before typing my comment. Disregard.
0

Featured Post

Control application downtime with dependency maps

Visualize the interdependencies between application components better with Applications Manager's automated application discovery and dependency mapping feature. Resolve performance issues faster by quickly isolating problematic components.

Join & Write a Comment

Tired of waiting for your show or movie to load?  Are buffering issues a constant problem with your internet connection?  Check this article out to see if these simple adjustments are the solution for you.
In the world of WAN, QoS is a pretty important topic for most, if not all, networks. Some WAN technologies have QoS mechanisms built in, but others, such as some L2 WAN's, don't have QoS control in the provider cloud.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

6 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now