Solved

ReadDirectoryChangesW asynchronous - how to trigger?

Posted on 2009-07-15
7
1,243 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I'm using Borland C++ and API's ReadDirectoryChangesW in the asynchronous way, to watch a directory for changes. I watch for rename, add delete files or folders within the directory. I hav a loop in my thread like the code you will find below. All works nice so far. .. to nice perhaps ...

The program runs for hours and all my file operations i.e deleting or programaticaly renaming hundrets of files in a split if secons handled in "section #1" correctly.

Hmm... but how to test the code in "section #2" if an asynchronous operation never happens?

My question therefore is only: How to simulate an asynchronous operation to test my code? Or better, how to trigger one?


Thanks in advance :-)
bResult = ReadDirectoryChangesW( ...);
 
if (bResult) { 
 
	// section #1
	blah ...;
	blah ...;
 
}
else {
 
	// section #2
	// code to handel the results of 
	// asynchronous operations
	
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:hasnpapa
  • 3
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 24862432
How are you using the 'asynchronous' way? Are you using an 'OVERLAPPED' struct or a completion routine?
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Ravi Kalla earned 400 total points
ID: 24862531
Step1: Create 2 files "file1" and "file2"
Step2: Write a program to rename a file from "file1" if it is "file11" and "file11" if it is "file1" and put this operation in an infinite loop.
Step3: Write another program to rename a file from "file2" if it is "file22" and "file22" if it is "file2" and put this operation in an infinite loop.
Step4: Now, execute the two programs created in "Step2" and "Step3" along with the program that you have to test. This is an asynchronous operation.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hasnpapa
ID: 24863289
@Ravi:
Realy thanks a lot for this explanation. At this point I don't kwno what a asynchronous operation basicly is. Now I do :-))

@jkr:
I'm using 'OVERLAPPED' struct in "section #2" as shown in the code above :-)

	
else {
	msg = "Reaching section #2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!";
	Synchronize(&UpdateMemo);
	DWORD dwResult = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, hEvents, FALSE, INFINITE);
	switch ( dwResult ) {
	case WAIT_OBJECT_0: // then "terminate event"
		this->Terminate();
		break;
	case WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1: // overlapped operation finished
		bResult = GetOverlappedResult(hDir, &ov, &BytesReturned, FALSE);
		if (!bResult) { // error!
		}
		else { //results of asynchronous operation
		}
	}
}

Open in new window

0
Live: Real-Time Solutions, Start Here

Receive instant 1:1 support from technology experts, using our real-time conversation and whiteboard interface. Your first 5 minutes are always free.

 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 24863340
There seems to be a misconception - the finishing of the overlapped operation is always the end of an asynchronous action...
0
 

Author Comment

by:hasnpapa
ID: 24863576
Hmm... but i works so far :-)

But, perhaps I have completely misunderstood the asynchronous data workflow ...

Would you have a look at my code please, jkr? I have mixed it up as I think, from the meager examples found tho this topic in forums and websites.

For me it is very important that I fully understand the code that I write and not to only cut&paste something and hope it will work. Do you have any further suggestions for me? Any help to learn this API stuff will be highliy appreciated ...
void __fastcall TShellChangeNotifier::Execute()
{
	HANDLE hEvents[2];
	OVERLAPPED ov;
	memset(&ov, 0, sizeof(ov));
	BOOL bResult;
	DWORD dwError;
	DWORD BytesReturned;
	size_t nBufSize = 32*1024;
	FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION* pBuffer = (FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION*)calloc(1, nBufSize);
	FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION* pBufferCurrent;
 
	ov.hEvent = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL);
	hEvents[0] = ov.hEvent;
	hEvents[1] = Form2->m_StopEvent; // stop thread event
 
	HANDLE hDir = CreateFile(MonitorDirectory, FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY, FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS|FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED, NULL);
 
	while (!Terminated) {
		bResult = ReadDirectoryChangesW(hDir, pBuffer, nBufSize, TRUE, FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_SIZE|FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_DIR_NAME|FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_FILE_NAME, &BytesReturned, &ov, NULL);
		if (bResult) {
			DWORD dwResult = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, hEvents, FALSE, INFINITE);
			if (dwResult == WAIT_OBJECT_0) {
				pBufferCurrent = pBuffer;
				do {
					AnsiString filename = AnsiString(pBufferCurrent->FileName).SubString(0, pBufferCurrent->FileNameLength / 2);
					if (pBufferCurrent->Action == FILE_ACTION_ADDED) {
						msg += "Add: "; msg += filename;
					}
					else if (pBufferCurrent->Action == FILE_ACTION_REMOVED) {
						msg += "Removed: "; msg += filename;
					}
					else if (pBufferCurrent->Action == FILE_ACTION_MODIFIED) {
						msg += "Modified: "; msg += filename;
					}
					else if (pBufferCurrent->Action == FILE_ACTION_RENAMED_OLD_NAME) {
						msg = "Old-Name: "; msg += filename;
						Synchronize(&UpdateMemo);
						pBufferCurrent = (FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION*)(((DWORD)pBufferCurrent) + pBufferCurrent->NextEntryOffset);
						msg = "New-Name: ";
						msg += AnsiString(pBufferCurrent->FileName).SubString(0, pBufferCurrent->FileNameLength / 2);
						Synchronize(&UpdateMemo);
					}
					//else if (pBufferCurrent->Action == FILE_ACTION_RENAMED_NEW_NAME) {
					//	msg += "NEW-Name: ";
					//	msg += filename;
					//}
					if (pBufferCurrent->NextEntryOffset) {
						pBufferCurrent = (FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION*)(((DWORD)pBufferCurrent) + pBufferCurrent->NextEntryOffset);
						msg += " ... Walk on Buffer";
						Synchronize(&UpdateMemo);
					}
					else {
						pBufferCurrent = NULL;
					}
				} while (pBufferCurrent != NULL);
			}
			else if (dwResult == WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1) {  the "terminat event"
				this->Terminate();
			}
		}
	}
	else {
		msg = "Reaching section #2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!";
		Synchronize(&UpdateMemo);
		DWORD dwResult = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, hEvents, FALSE, INFINITE);
		switch ( dwResult ) {
			case WAIT_OBJECT_0: // the "terminate event"
				this->Terminate();
				break;
			case WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1: // overlapped operation finished
				bResult = GetOverlappedResult(hDir, &ov, &BytesReturned, FALSE);
				if (!bResult) { // error!
				}
			else { //results of asynchronous operation
			}
		}
	}		
	CloseHandle( hDir );
	free(pBuffer);
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 86

Assisted Solution

by:jkr
jkr earned 100 total points
ID: 24863779
Let me put it like that - there is no reason to use an OVERLAPPED struct in your code at all, you could just leave it out. You have a single thread of execution, and waiting for the event to be signalled right after calling that function makes little sense. It would be less CPU consuming to wait for a handle created by 'FindFirstChangeNotification()' (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364417.aspx) and then call 'ReadDirectoryChangesW()', e.g. like
    HANDLE  hNotify;
    DWORD   dwResult;
 
    hNotify =   FindFirstChangeNotification     (   MonitorDirectory,
                                                    TRUE,
                                                    FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_SIZE
                                                );
 
    hEvents[0] = hNotify;
    hEvents[1] = Form2->m_StopEvent; // stop thread event
 
    HANDLE hDir = CreateFile(
                          MonitorDirectory,                   // pointer to the file name
                          FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY,                // access (read-write) mode
                          FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_DELETE,  // share mode
                          NULL,                               // security descriptor
                          OPEN_EXISTING,                      // how to create
                          FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS,         // file attributes
                          NULL                                // file with attributes to copy
                        );
 
    TCHAR acBuf[1024];
 
    DWORD dwRet;
 
    for (   ;;)
        {
            DWORD dwResult = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, hEvents, FALSE, INFINITE);
 
 
            ReadDirectoryChangesW(hDir,(LPVOID) acBuf,1024,FALSE,FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_SIZE | FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_CREATION,&dwRet,NULL,NULL);
 
            FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION* pInfo = (FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION*) acBuf;
 
            //...
 
            FindNextChangeNotification  (   hNotify);
        };
 
    CloseHandle(hDir);

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:hasnpapa
ID: 24864223
In my very first atempt, I had a short code like the showen by you, using the synchronous way.

But soon I figured out, that ReadDirectoryChangesW blocks the Termination of the thread and so the Close() of the whole Programm, while it is waiting for the next event.

Well, I cut&paste ;-) your code and compile it.
Now, as the same effect as im my first atempt, the thread cannot be terminated on command, because the ReadDirectoryChangesW is waiting for its event. If I let ReadDirectoryChangesW work asynchronously ... yes, then it will be "terminatable".

0

Featured Post

Live: Real-Time Solutions, Start Here

Receive instant 1:1 support from technology experts, using our real-time conversation and whiteboard interface. Your first 5 minutes are always free.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

When writing generic code, using template meta-programming techniques, it is sometimes useful to know if a type is convertible to another type. A good example of when this might be is if you are writing diagnostic instrumentation for code to generat…
Introduction This article is the first in a series of articles about the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger.  It provides a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focuses on additional topics in breakpoints.  Lastly, Part 3 focuses on th…
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

815 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

11 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now