Solved

Problems DNS after scavening dns

Posted on 2009-07-15
10
247 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
Hello,

I am running to some dns problems every 21 days.

When i run a dcdiag /test:dns i get the following results (i will put the full log later on)

 Summary of DNS test results:
         
                                            Auth Basc Forw Del  Dyn  RReg Ext  
               ________________________________________________________________
            Domain: domain.local
               serverdc2                 PASS FAIL PASS PASS WARN FAIL n/a  
         
         ......................... domain.local failed test DNS

After a dcdiag /fix everything works fine again.

DNS Scavening is set to every 7 days but after 21 days we receive this error.
There are 2 domain controllers, serverdc1 is the primairy server and serverdc2 is the secondairy.

Does anybody had any idea why this is happening every 21 days.

some other errors in the log :

Domain Controller Diagnosis

Performing initial setup:
   * Verifying that the local machine serverdc2, is a DC.
   * Connecting to directory service on server serverdc2.
   * Collecting site info.
   * Identifying all servers.
   * Identifying all NC cross-refs.
   * Found 2 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
   Done gathering initial info.

Doing initial required tests
   
   Testing server: domain\SERVERDC2
      Starting test: Connectivity
         * Active Directory LDAP Services Check
         The host e3a31358-75b4-41b4-886d-8660f088e000._msdcs.domain.local could not be resolved to an
         IP address.  Check the DNS server, DHCP, server name, etc
         Although the Guid DNS name

         (e3a31358-75b4-41b4-886d-8660f088e000._msdcs.domain.local) couldn't be

         resolved, the server name (serverdc2.domain.local) resolved to the IP

         address (**.**.**.**) and was pingable.  Check that the IP address is

         registered correctly with the DNS server.
         ......................... SERVERDC2 failed test Connectivity

Thanks for the help!
0
Comment
Question by:fmecwm
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 5
10 Comments
 
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 24867621

Could you let us know the Aging intervals have you set please?

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:fmecwm
ID: 24867666
The aging intverval is set to 7 days

Is this what you want to know?

Stefan
0
 
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 24867672

Yep, it is, that's both of them?

Are you able to verify if the "e3a31358-75b4-41b4-886d-8660f088e000._msdcs.domain.local" exists in DNS at the point of failure?

Chris
0
NFR key for Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license (for 1 year, up to 10 users). This license allows for the non‑production use of Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 in your home lab without any feature limitations.

 

Author Comment

by:fmecwm
ID: 24867709
This is on both servers yes.

i'm not able to check this because we have already runned the fix so everything is working fine again.

But when this problem occurs the _msdcs.fmecwm.local in forward lookup zones is empty.

I hope this is enough information for you, otherwise i have to wait 21 days.

Stefan
0
 
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 24867731

I meant both Aging intervals (No-Refresh and Refresh) :)

We can theorise that it gets Scavenged, it fits into a multiple of the scavenging period. But the NetLogon service should be sending a Refresh for that record (and all other service records) once every 24 hours.

Do you have any other DNS servers listed in TCP/IP configuration?

And do you see any errors in the event log for DNS record registration?

The Host (A) and PTR records are still present when this problem occurs aren't they? Although those are maintained by DHCP Client rather than NetLogon the same 24 hour refresh applies.

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:fmecwm
ID: 24867799
The host and ptr records are still present yes.

In the dns event this is the only information log :

15 juli 18:00
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones     = 14,
Visited Nodes     = 722,
Scavenged Nodes   = 0,
Scavenged Records = 0.
 
This cycle took 0 seconds.
 
The next scavenging cycle is scheduled to run in 168 hours.

0
 
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 24867814

Is that the cycle immediately preceding the last failure?

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:fmecwm
ID: 24867821
Yes
this is the olny event in de eventlog and i did not checked it yesterday after 18:00 but this morning.
This happends every 21 days.
i hope this is an answer on your question (my english is not that good)
0
 
LVL 71

Accepted Solution

by:
Chris Dent earned 250 total points
ID: 24867852

Do any of the Scavenging events have values for "Scavenged Nodes" or "Scavenged Records"?

You might consider creating a new Forward Lookup Zone for _msdcs.fmecwm.local. Then apply very long Aging Intervals to the new zone.

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:fmecwm
ID: 24901663
Hi Crhis thanks for the help!
I'm considering to create a new forwared lookup zone.
The scavening is set to 7 days, will it help to set this to 21 days? we have about 300 systems here.

Thanks for the help.

0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Creating an OSPF network that automatically (dynamically) reroutes network traffic over other connections to prevent network downtime.
Resolve DNS query failed errors for Exchange
Finding and deleting duplicate (picture) files can be a time consuming task. My wife and I, our three kids and their families all share one dilemma: Managing our pictures. Between desktops, laptops, phones, tablets, and cameras; over the last decade…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

696 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question