Solved

How to advertise non-connected EIGRP routes

Posted on 2009-07-16
8
243 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-07
Hi,

Simple set up...2 sites, A & B....they talk via a wireless link which fails over to a backup wireless link when it's down.  I have being doing some network re-designing and I want to know how to advertise the networks beyond each sides router...see diagram

Site A - Router A is the EIGRP router I am working on
Networks I want to advertise to site B - 172.16.0.0 /20   10.10.20.0 /30    192.168.4.0 /24 (DMZ - not in pic)

Site B - Router B is the EIGRP router I am working on
Networks I want to advertise to site A - 192.168.5.0 /24   10.10.40.0 /30    192.168.3.0 /24 (DMZ - not in pic)

When the primary wireless goes down I want to failover to the backup

Any idea how to configure the EIGRP here?

Thanks

Ally
wireless-EIGRP-solution.jpg
0
Comment
Question by:ally0000
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24868332
The "no auto-summary" is optional.

Site A multilayer switch:
router eigrp 100
 no auto-summary
 network 10.0.0.0
 network 172.16.0.0

Site A router
 router eigrp 100
  no auto-summary
  network 10.0.0.0

Site B router
 router eigrp 100
  no auto-summary
  network 10.0.0.0

Site B multilayer switch:
router eigrp 100
 no auto-summary
 network 10.0.0.0
 network 192.168.5.0

0
 

Author Comment

by:ally0000
ID: 24868514
Thanks for the reply. Surely the 10.0.0.0 without auto summary would cover my /30 networks at both sites? Do I really need to introduce EIGRP on the other routers? Can I not just somehow advertise these networks on just the routers controlling the wireless?

Thanks
0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 500 total points
ID: 24870137
>Thanks for the reply. Surely the 10.0.0.0 without auto summary would cover my /30 networks at both sites?

The no auto-summary was for the 172.16.0.0/20 network. And like I said, it's optional.

>Can I not just somehow advertise these networks on just the routers controlling the wireless?

The multilayer switches need to have the other site's networks in their routing tables. You could create static routes for all of the devices but I thought you wanted to run EIGRP.

0
Simple, centralized multimedia control

Watch and learn to see how ATEN provided an easy and effective way for three jointly-owned pubs to control the 60 televisions located across their three venues utilizing the ATEN Control System, Modular Matrix Switch and HDBaseT extenders.

 

Author Comment

by:ally0000
ID: 24871348
Hi,

I have static routes on all the network devices but I would like router A in site A (the one controlling the wireless link) to advertise 172.16.0.0 /20, 10.10.20.0 /30 and192.168.4.0 /24 but as they are not directly connected then they are not advertised. What about adding a loopback interface for each subnet?
0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24873284
>I have static routes on all the network devices

Then why do you need to advertise anything? If you've got static routes to all the destinations, what else is there?
0
 

Author Comment

by:ally0000
ID: 24873499
I thought it would be better for eigrp to handle all the routing, seeing as it's there.

If you don't think it's a big deal then I'll just leave it

Thanks

Ally
0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 24873566
I think you're missing my point (or I'm missing yours).

If you've got static routes defined for all networks on all layer 3 devices, then you don't need EIGRP.

If you're running EIGRP on all layer 3 devices then you don't need static routes.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ally0000
ID: 24873599
OK, I guess I'm just seeing if what I am doing is OK....thanks for replying

Ally
0

Featured Post

NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
What problem can Native VLAN mismatch causes 4 62
Simple Router Management, Subnets and VLANs e.g. RV0xx 7 76
Public DNS  Vs BGP 20 58
VLAN 1 Line Protocol Down 9 42
This article is a step by step guide on how to create a basic PTP link using Ubiquiti airOS devices. This guide can be used on the following Ubiquiti AirMAX devices. Nanostation, Bullets, AirBridge, Nanobeam, NanoBridge to name a few. Please review …
Hello to you all, I hear of many people congratulate AWS (Amazon Web Services) on how easy it is to spin up and create new EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances, but then fail and struggle to connect to them using simple tools such as SSH (Secure…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question