kt2003
asked on
HSRP
Let's say that we have two Cisco switches 3750 and six 2900 and I have to configure three VLANs. What configuration should I implement to achive full redandancy at Layer 2 and also at Layer 3.
ASKER
Istvan thanks a lot. What is the advantange\disadvantage of having clustring at L3 over HSRP (active/passive)?
If you clustering the 2 3750 switch will be only one switch!
If your server has 2 NIC you able to make Full redundancy!
In this case better way to clustering, becouse the s swtches able to see each other wirh 32Gps!
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/product_data_sheet0900aecd80371991.html
If your server has 2 NIC you able to make Full redundancy!
In this case better way to clustering, becouse the s swtches able to see each other wirh 32Gps!
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/product_data_sheet0900aecd80371991.html
ASKER
Ikalmar. Thank you. I don't have much experience configuring switches so let me ask you one more question. If I configure switch-1 at L3 as active and switch-2 at L3 as passive using HSRP, would this configuration be regarded as clustering?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thanks
Please read the following:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/prod_presentation09186a0080161372.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/prod_presentation09186a0080161372.pdf
L2 redundancy:
- You connect two 3750 wirh stack cable to make a cluster
- All other switches connect two ports to 3750_1 and 3750_2
- All switches uplink ports configured to Etherchannel, so the uplink will be 2G
L3 redundancy
- You connect two 3750 wirh stack cable to make a cluster
Best regards,
Istvan