ITPro44
asked on
2008 R2 File Server and VHD files
Scenario:
I am setting up a Server 2008 R2 File Server in a branch office. It has about 2TB of storage space on the file server. I am considering creating a .VHD file and mounting this as a local drive and making this the file share. This would give good flexibility in the future of moving the data around if need be.
Questions:
1. Is ther any reasons I shouldn't do this?
2. Will there be any performance decrease compared to not using a VHD file?
3. I have heard that a dynamically expanding hard drive has decreased performance, any idea on how significant this is?
4. Any other recommendations or thought are greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help with this!
I am setting up a Server 2008 R2 File Server in a branch office. It has about 2TB of storage space on the file server. I am considering creating a .VHD file and mounting this as a local drive and making this the file share. This would give good flexibility in the future of moving the data around if need be.
Questions:
1. Is ther any reasons I shouldn't do this?
2. Will there be any performance decrease compared to not using a VHD file?
3. I have heard that a dynamically expanding hard drive has decreased performance, any idea on how significant this is?
4. Any other recommendations or thought are greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help with this!
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER