• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 709
  • Last Modified:

cost of activeX in intraweb app

easy 500..

simple intraweb application has an active X on a form.
We know that the server owns all pages.. but is it also true for:
1. the activeX?
2. the data residing in the activeX.
im pretty sure the cost is for the TIWActiveX container itself..
but would like confirmation as the activeX may be 100MB of data per client. with thousands of active session.
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
Emmanuel PASQUIERFreelance Project ManagerCommented:
The ActiveX is downloaded from the server the first time, and setup automatically in windows registry.

After that point, the activeX behaves exactly like another application, it can either have local data in files that it creates, or access DB, or do whatever you want (which is why it is a non secured technology)
Emmanuel PASQUIERFreelance Project ManagerCommented:
when you are talking about cost, you mean what exactly ?
cost in bandwidth ?
Emmanuel PASQUIERFreelance Project ManagerCommented:
I suppose you are doing something like this :

The 100 Mb of data, are they created by the activeX, using files ? if so they are local, so there is no cost for the VOLUME on the server
Cloud Class® Course: CompTIA Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

controlrAuthor Commented:
same as example.. but 1 major exception:
the data comes from other servers and not the IW server
the only part thing thats served by IW is the IWActiveX container.. the actual activeX is downloaded from another server alltogether, thus freeing IW resources.
the cost meanning the LIVE processeing data within the activeX on client's machine.
thuoght that since its within the IW container.. the server may "carry" the activeX.. but looks like its on the client's end.
so thanks !
BTW.. bob's activeX example does not work on BDS2010.. too many evolutions in  server coding since that version.
So the real question would be..
do i really need IW? or can i use standalone ISAPI  with pageproducer having a container rady made with those javascripts  to communicate with the activeX ?
if thats the case, then i wil open a quick thread for another easy 500 points  for a "skeleton"  ISAPI example with the javascript embeded.
if not, ill reward the thread.
Emmanuel PASQUIERFreelance Project ManagerCommented:
Well, If you are using an ActiveX to deport majority of your process on the client's side, and that the data are on a DB on another server, then your Web server is nothing more than a convenient deploy & update solution. You could do that with a simple HTML page. What process do you still need in your Web server ?
If you need simple HTML but changing slightly (like different start parameters) from one user to another, then effectively ISAPI can do the trick nicely.
controlrAuthor Commented:
you probably right on the ISAPI  route, as i have to do some initial user authentication  and allow the axtiveX to receive the params.
I will open a new thread and reward more points
controlrAuthor Commented:
openning new thread for ISAPI sample request
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now