anushahanna
asked on
disk alignment partitioning for SQL performance
KevinK recommends for SQL on Windows Server 2003 to have 64K sector offset for the Data drives.
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/10/06/how-to-improve-application-and-database-performance-up-to-40-in-one-easy-step.aspx
Ours has 32K as the Starting Offset. Since 64K is multiples of 32K, will that be ok, or is it recommended to change it to 64KB.
thanks
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/kevin_kline/archive/2008/10/06/how-to-improve-application-and-database-performance-up-to-40-in-one-easy-step.aspx
Ours has 32K as the Starting Offset. Since 64K is multiples of 32K, will that be ok, or is it recommended to change it to 64KB.
thanks
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Ours also W 2003 Server, and yes, 31.5K is standart.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
tiago_aviz, it is just not about the stripe size, but if it will lead to 2 IO ops instead of 1.
We have 100 spindles underneath our LAN, but still the Disk IO has remained the same..
We have 100 spindles underneath our LAN, but still the Disk IO has remained the same..
ASKER
Vaidas911, perhaps you should have gone higher than 64k?
ASKER
Vaidas911, did you do it on W 2003 Server?
I thought ours was 32KB, but the it is only 31.5K of metadata.