• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1121
  • Last Modified:

Hyper-V on Core or Full GUI?

Hello Experts,

I have been using Hyper-V on Server 2008 R2 Core just fine. However, sometimes I feel that it can be confusing to navigate/troubleshoot. Basically, I would like some real-world opinions on whether it's better, in the long-run, to have Hyper-V on Core or the standard GUI. I orignally put it on Core to reduce the OS footprint and free up resources for the Guest Machines that would be built.

Thanks.
0
LCNW
Asked:
LCNW
2 Solutions
 
JoltinJoeCommented:
On the kinds of servers typically running several virtual machines, resources are typically plentiful enough that I find the performance gain of core over the full GUI to be negligible.  I suppose core sort of forces the fact that less junk can be installed by admins and bog the server down, but good server management can counter that easily enough.
0
 
Rob WilliamsCommented:
I agree, nothing wrong with using core, but if you look at the size of the install, and monitor the resources used by both core and GUI versions there is very little difference. Of course you can download Hyper-V server 2008 for free where as GUI you have to have a Server 2008 license, which is one significant advantage.
0

Featured Post

How to Use the Help Bell

Need to boost the visibility of your question for solutions? Use the Experts Exchange Help Bell to confirm priority levels and contact subject-matter experts for question attention.  Check out this how-to article for more information.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now