HBIT
asked on
New DNS server?
I have been using a Windows 2003 server for DNS for the past few years. No problems with it, but I was thinking of changing as I planned to move my DNS server to my underused Virtual Server and save space.
I thought of upgrading or changing the server, and was curious if there is much difference between either using Windows 2008, Simple DNS plus or using Bind with a linux distribution. Money is not an issue as my Microsoft products cost very little within my Microsoft School Agreement. So, any real issues with any of them, or do they all perform relatively well for DNS usage?
I thought of upgrading or changing the server, and was curious if there is much difference between either using Windows 2008, Simple DNS plus or using Bind with a linux distribution. Money is not an issue as my Microsoft products cost very little within my Microsoft School Agreement. So, any real issues with any of them, or do they all perform relatively well for DNS usage?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Sorry Chris your right. There are others that will support SRV records (I don't know which ones :-/). For simplicity it's brobably easier to stick with MS if there is no reason to use something else.
Happy New Year to you!!
Happy New Year to you!!
And to you :)
Chris
ASKER
Thanks.
2003 and 2008 DNS are pretty similar with the exception that 2008 supports IPv6 out of the box.
If you planning on a new DNS server use Windows 2008.