Mailbox limits with Exchange SP2

Posted on 2010-01-06
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2012-05-08
With Exchange SP2, what kind of problems might occur if you leave the mailbox size to unlimited?  There is plenty of space on the server so that really would not be an issue for a very long time.   Microsoft suggests a certian size limit be setup and I am wondering is there a specific reason other then just to conserver disk space?   What type of problems would occur as these mailbox sizes increase.  

The reason I ask is that I am supporting a company that left the default to unlimited mailbox sizes.  Total of 25 mailboxes.   It has not been an issue but my gut instinct and general best practice is that this eventually can't be good.

Right now I have one user with 5,020,098 KB mailbox size which is excessive.    I have another 2 that are 3 GB or higher and 7 users that are 2 GB or more.     I'm just trying to cover my end by understanding if this could be a problem on the server end eventually.  In the past, Exchange didn't handle this well but that was 8 years ago and a different version.

I've recommend the users to create personal folders and to manage their folders better but it falls on a deaf ear.    Their laptops are high end so the process speed has not been compromised yet when openining Outlook.   If I have to recreate their Outlook profile that sometimes takes a log time.

Again any experience or insight on this issue would be great!
Question by:CAT27
  • 3
  • 2
LVL 13

Expert Comment

ID: 26191296

Planning Mailbox Store Limits
LVL 13

Expert Comment

ID: 26191319

Author Comment

ID: 26191375
That is for Exchange 2000 which is not what we are using.  And I understand how to change all of that but thanks for the quick response.  

I am asking if anyone has personally experienced this unlimited mailbox size to cause any issues in their environment or is this just a suggestion by Microsoft that only has meaning when your disk storage is limited?

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.


Author Comment

ID: 26191417
The Quotas is helpful, thanks for that.    I really don't think I'm going to get to change any of this type of stuff until I have some concrete reasons and that is why I posted this question.   Hopefully someone can help with that.
LVL 58

Accepted Solution

tigermatt earned 1500 total points
ID: 26192265

Allowing user mailboxes to grow uncontrollably is a major issue. The mailbox quotas give users an incentive to keep their mailboxes down in size, conserving space on the server.

You didn't mention which version of Exchange 2003 you are running. However, there is a default database size limit of 18GB in 2003 Standard Edition. This can be raised to a hard maximum of 75GB - and then the database will not grow any larger. You have to make a registry tweak for the size limit to be pushed up to 75GB: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912375.

5GB mailboxes are not really anything large, though. I have a number of Exchange Servers where 20GB mailboxes are not out of the norm. The problem normally comes with the number of items stored per folder in Outlook; Microsoft recommend no more than about 5000 items per folder to ensure Outlook remains stable.

In most organisations, the main issue is the use of email as a) a long term storage solution and b) another file server. I am frequently reminding businesses - particularly small/medium business owners - that Exchange is a COLLABORATION solution, NOT a file server. If 5GB mailboxes concern you, find out what the users are storing there and advise they move large attachments to a file share someplace else.

Many of these changes cannot come from IT but must come from a policy implemented by management, so your experience of your work having little effect isn't uncommon either. Unless you forcefully stop people using their mailboxes (by implementing quotas), you won't get people to listen.

Finally, the use of PST files (Personal Folders) is an incredibly bad idea. I wrote an article here at EE which covers why: http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/Software/Server_Software/Email_Servers/Exchange/Why-you-shouldn't-use-PST-files.html.


Author Closing Comment

ID: 31673517
tigermatt information wrote a lot of what I already knew but it gave me some thing to show that backs what I've been saying all along.   Until something crazy happens I'm not sure I will win this battle and they will continue to treat mail as a storage.

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Take a look at these 6 Outlook Email management tools which can augment the working and performance of Microsoft Outlook to give you a more rewarding emailing experience.
Steps to fix error: “Couldn’t mount the database that you specified. Specified database: HU-DB; Error code: An Active Manager operation fail”
how to add IIS SMTP to handle application/Scanner relays into office 365.
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an anti-spam), the admin…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month14 days, 8 hours left to enroll

840 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question