Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of wood1e
wood1e

asked on

Difference between Umbraco Open Source and Umbraco Pro

Hi,

I am thinking of using either dotnetnuke or Umbraco as a website framework for a client. Both appear to provide open source solution.

With dotnetnuke I can see the differences in paying or using the open source version.

But with Umbraco there appears to be no difference, apart from when you pay you get support? If that the only difference? Or are some of Umbraco modules/addons/functionality removed from the open source version?

Final question, am I looking at the right solutions?

The client would be wanting fully content managed website (site text, images, video), Upload video to site/social networking simultaneously,  integration with MS products (possibly), manage pages/menus, add in forms, add in questionaires?

Sorry bit of a general question at the end there, the open issue is more important :)
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Daniel Junges
Daniel Junges
Flag of Brazil image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of wood1e
wood1e

ASKER

I know I can't believe I missed that prior to writing my question!!

How about the functionality, can it handle fully content managed website (site text, images, video), Upload video to site/social networking simultaneously,  integration with MS products (possibly), online booking auto update with network based calendar system (obviously depending on what the client runs) manage pages/menus, add in forms, add in questionaires?
Avatar of wood1e

ASKER

Or would some of this have to be developed?
SOLUTION
Avatar of Kumaraswamy R
Kumaraswamy R
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of wood1e

ASKER

Many thanks