Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of ValleyENT
ValleyENT

asked on

SQL Server Buildout/Config

Experts,

Getting ready to upgrade our primary application and going off of some guildlines for their recommend build out configuration and this is what i've got. Any input on this would be great. This is a SQL 2005 box that takes a pretty hefty load.

1. HP DL580 G5, Quad DC Xeon's at 2.8ghz, 64GB of RAM
2. RAID CONFIG

(4) 74GB 15K RPM Drives in RAID 1+0; Operating System + Page File
(4) 74GB 15K RPM Drives in RAID 1+0; LOGS, SQL LDF's, W/ 16 GB
(10) 74GB 15K RPM Drives in RAID 1+0 on HP Storage Works SAS; SQL.EXE and DB's

3. Windows Server 2003 Enterprise 64bit, SQL Server 2005 Standard 64bit

This may seem overkill to some, but it is required. I am more concerned about how the load is spread between raid ie - should SQL be installed on seperate raid for optimum performance. Any input in this regard would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance~
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Auric1983
Auric1983
Flag of Canada image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Avatar of Netman66
Netman66
Flag of Canada image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
I would agree with Netman, that the config looks good, I was just wondering about the log file drive.

Are you also going to get the HP ILO license? well worth the additional $$

Good point!  Buy the iLo Advanced license for that and you won't regret a penny of the cost.
Avatar of ValleyENT
ValleyENT

ASKER

I will be configuring ILO for sure. The log files are much smaller than the database so I didn't think I would need more that 4 drives and wouldn't require the massive quanitty of spindles.
Thanks.

I guess the last piece of the puzzle is why Server 2003 and SQL 2005?