Backup & Restore - Best Practises - Offsite Replication.

Hi All,

I'm looking for some recomendations and guidance to improve my current Backup strategy.

Two locations connected via 1.5mbps MPLS link, each site holds approx 400gb of data that is backed up nightly using BackupExec 12.5 and an LTO3 tape drive at each location.

What we are looking to do is a simple cost effective way to replicate our data from our main site to our branch office and vice versa.

First thought was to use DFS replication. Only problem with that is if user at site A deletes files then they will be deleted at site b.

The data that will be replicated will be only for offsite storage / backup purposes so the users at the second site won't be accessing it.

Any thoughts on cost effective devices or appliances to do this for me? I've researched the HP lefthand and Dell Equalogics SAN's but the cost is quite high.

LVL 16
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

What kind of data are we talking about?

The best tool to do replication is Double Take
Auric1983Author Commented:

Mostly file share, we're an engineering firm so a lot of documents, photos etc.

I would say 75% is documents and multimedia, the rest is Exchange and a few small SQL databases.

Our ERP is hosted elsewhere so there is no ERP data.
Double Take is the way to go.
Newly released Acronis True Image 2019

In announcing the release of the 15th Anniversary Edition of Acronis True Image 2019, the company revealed that its artificial intelligence-based anti-ransomware technology – stopped more than 200,000 ransomware attacks on 150,000 customers last year.

Auric1983Author Commented:
If I was to look at using Double Take, what sort of hardware would be recomended at each end for the storage?

And how would you say this stacks up against a SAN with built in block level replication technology.
You actual question is far more complicated than the EE can handle. Without knowing your environment, I cannot really comment.

You are free to contact me - my info is in my profile.

I'll answer your original question. I assume you just want to preserve data, not trying to replicate a whole system. In this case, DT is the way to do it. You basically set up another set of machines on the other hand, then let DT to replicate. Each replication set needs 2 DT licenses which costs 2x$2500.

SAN replication works in the similar fashion if you can tolerate the cost. There are certain things that SAN does not replicate well such as DC.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Auric1983Author Commented:
Thank you.

I'm not too worried about replicating the Active Directory structure, we have about 10 locations and the AD structure is at each.

I'm just looking to protect our Data and LOB applications.

Thank you for the information
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Storage Software

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.