achieving good LTO 4 speed

Currently building a server to host some direct attached storage to stream to the LTO4 that's connected to the same box via U320 cable, via Commvault.

I can't find any stats on the disks MB/sec performance so, do i buy 14 performance disks for 7TB or will the 2TB disk be able to supply a fast enough stream to the LTO4 to achieve 180MEG/sec

the server will be a brand new DL360 g6, how does one work this out?
MSA60

12 x 600 GB 6G 15K LFF Dual-port ENT SAS

or

12 x 2 TB 6G 7.2K LFF Dual-port MDL SAS

Obviously if the 2TB drives can achieve a good MB/sec stream to the LTO4 I'd prefer the larger space they provide.
LVL 1
MC2010Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

DavidPresidentCommented:
Either solution is capable of pumping that much I/O, if it is configured properly.   Make sure the LTO4 is using a PCIe controller, not PCIx.  Many things will make or break the configuration, and the specifics of how you configure the RAID, your choice of O/S, and filesystem parameters are vital.

The key is to keep it streaming instead of going into a stop start mode, you want to insure that the storage pool for the tape is not wasting a lot of precious I/Os handling things like the operating system itself.  

One big problem is that you had better be doing RAID6 on the 12+2, it will take DAYS to rebuild after a drive failure, if the system is busy, it might take a week.  Do you want to risk a 2nd failure?

So if you have RAID6, then optimal configuration is going to be 10 disks total.  Optimal for RAID5 is 9 disks.    Use the other disks to build a RAID1 for the O/S.  Use the other disk as a hot spare.
0
MC2010Author Commented:
this disk library will be for backups only. and be windows. client to disk will be different window from the to tape, so there will only ever be one stream running when running to tape, OS will be on a internal mirror 15k raid.
0
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
So the LTO4 runs at 120MB/sec, that shouldnt be a problem from either of those two disk setups. With the speed of modern drives, achieving 11MB/sec per drive (RAID-5 11+1) or 12MB/s (10+2)  even with a 7.5K drive is not a problem
I have always used a disk throughput of  2-3 times tape speed to ensure that the tape drive cache is kept full and therefore the tape will stay streaming with no chance of  shoe-shining as thta is what kills the performance. That means 24-36MB/s per drive still shouldnt trouble them.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
andyalderCommented:
I agree the 7.2k disks will be fine as long as the disk staging area does not become defragmented since you'll be doing sequential reads and writes rather than randon I/O.
0
MC2010Author Commented:
thank you this seals it for me
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Storage

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.