Tencha
asked on
Cisco 3750 - IOS change
The factory version of the switch was not ideal, so a contractor upgrade the switch to a new version. I went in the switch,
(config)#boot system flash:/c3750-ipservicesk9-
# reload
*******************
Initializing flashfs...
flashfs[1]: 935 files, 14 directories
flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories
flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 32514048
flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 30834176
flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 1679872
flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 17 seconds.
flashfs[1]: Initialization complete....done Initializing flashfs.
Checking for Bootloader upgrade.. not needed
POST: CPU MIC register Tests : Begin
POST: CPU MIC register Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: PortASIC Memory Tests : Begin
POST: PortASIC Memory Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: CPU MIC interface Loopback Tests : Begin
POST: CPU MIC interface Loopback Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: PortASIC RingLoopback Tests : Begin
POST: PortASIC RingLoopback Tests : End, Status Passed
front_end/ (directory)
extracting front_end/fe_type_1 (34760 bytes)
extracting front_end/fe_type_2 (78400 bytes)
extracting front_end/front_end_ucode_
extracting ucode_info (76 bytes)
**************************
I''ve been waiting for about 15mins from "extracting"... is this normal or is this an error?
I'm getting worried....
(config)#boot system flash:/c3750-ipservicesk9-
# reload
*******************
Initializing flashfs...
flashfs[1]: 935 files, 14 directories
flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories
flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 32514048
flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 30834176
flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 1679872
flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 17 seconds.
flashfs[1]: Initialization complete....done Initializing flashfs.
Checking for Bootloader upgrade.. not needed
POST: CPU MIC register Tests : Begin
POST: CPU MIC register Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: PortASIC Memory Tests : Begin
POST: PortASIC Memory Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: CPU MIC interface Loopback Tests : Begin
POST: CPU MIC interface Loopback Tests : End, Status Passed
POST: PortASIC RingLoopback Tests : Begin
POST: PortASIC RingLoopback Tests : End, Status Passed
front_end/ (directory)
extracting front_end/fe_type_1 (34760 bytes)
extracting front_end/fe_type_2 (78400 bytes)
extracting front_end/front_end_ucode_
extracting ucode_info (76 bytes)
**************************
I''ve been waiting for about 15mins from "extracting"... is this normal or is this an error?
I'm getting worried....
elsewhere1
Certainly not typical. Did it ever return an error or?
ASKER
NO it did not, it finally went through. But it appears that it did not help any, I still have the same configuration, no how to blow it out of the water but keep the same version?
Hi,
It seems the image maybe corrupted, so you need to upgrade it, there is two way:
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5623025.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_tech_note09186a0080169696.shtml
tftpdnld is faster, but not all devisec supported it!:(
Best regards,
Istvan
It seems the image maybe corrupted, so you need to upgrade it, there is two way:
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5623025.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_tech_note09186a0080169696.shtml
tftpdnld is faster, but not all devisec supported it!:(
Best regards,
Istvan
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
It worked now I can configure the switch.