Web Server in a DMZ on a PIX 515 security help needed

I have a PIX 515 that has a DMZ. I need to place a web server in the DMZ and have it access a MS SQL server inside our network. The server is 2008 R2. My plan is to connect a switch to the DMZ interface and then connect the web server to the switch. For access back to our SQL server I was thinking of using the second NIC on the web server and connecting that to a vlan on the switch and placing the SQL server's second NIC on the same vlan, both NICs using a completely different subnet than that of our internal network. Of course I would open the respective ports on the PIX needed for access. The switch that is connected to the DMZ would only have the web server and the sql server's second nic connected to it on their own vlan.

Is this a good plan from a security and operational standpoint? Do you see anything wrong with this plan or have any suggestions? What is a best practice?

Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Well, your desing is good, but as per my experience, the practice followed is to have the default route of the Web server point to the interface of the firewall to which it is connected. The firewall will naturally have routes to pass traffic to the internal network (sql server). All u need to make sure is that only necessary ports and source are allowed to access the Web server and the SQL server, in the firewall.
My recommendation would be to avoid the 2nd NIC scenario for SQL and the Web Server. Unless you have a massive amount of volume of SQL traffic just let it all pass through the NIC. With your design you will have direct exposure to the SQL server all ports should by chance the Web server become compromized, then should the SQL server become compromized an attacker will have access to your entire internal LAN. In effect you have created a bridge path around your PIX to your inside network.

You should work from the priciple of least privilege.

1. Create a subnet and add switch and web server to dmz interface on PIX
2. Create access and nat rules between ouside and dmz to allow access to web server on port 80 (and 443 if needed)
3. Create access and nat rules between dmz and inside to allow web server access only to SQL server on tcp 1433 (or whatever port your SQL is set to listen on)

Good Luck
wayy2beAuthor Commented:

That sounds much better. I will add a switch to the DMZ port on the 515 and connect the web server to that switch.  What commands do I need to use to configure steps 2 & 3?  I need outside users to access ports 80 and 443 and the web server needs to access ports 1433 on SQL server and 25 on our mail server. Any help you can provide would be great.  Thanks
You will need to create static statements and acls to permit the access - assumming your web server is ip a.a.a.a, sql server is ip b.b.b.b, mail server is ip c.c.c.c and new interface is called dmz it will look something like:

# allow access to web server
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host a.a.a.a eq http
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host a.a.a.a eq https

# allow web server to access inside sql and smtp
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp host a.a.a.a host b.b.b.b eq 1433
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit tcp host a.a.a.a host c.c.c.c eq smtp

# define translation rules (assumming network starts with 0 and netmask is
# this also assumes that smtp and sql server are on network b.b.b.0
# defines routing for entire dmz network to outside and inside
static (dmz,outside) a.a.a.0 a.a.a.0 netmask
static (inside,dmz) b.b.b.0 b.b.b.0 netmask

If you have other inside networks to route to from dmz add static statements for those networks as well
Good Luck

Good Luck

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
wayy2beAuthor Commented:
Sounds good and thank you for the info. I cannot try this for a week or two and Experts Exchange keeps bombing me with "Abandoned Question" emails (Whats up with that?). What I will do is close the question and if I have difficulty I will repost. Thanks again for your help!
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
OS Security

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.