Solved

Configure SBS 2008 migration from sbs 2003 without  internet address

Posted on 2010-08-15
2
427 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Can SBS be setup without setting up a domain name in internet address?

We have our website and email hosted.
Use a 3rd party email application (phoneslips that's what the owner insists on.)
Use a IP address to acces RWW.

Or  or if they decide use IIS and exchange in the future, can it be setup with their domain name, while allowing the 3rd party email application to work in the meantime?
0
Comment
Question by:AJHebert
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
epohl earned 250 total points
ID: 33442895
You can but i wouldn't recommend it. You will have to enter https for the rww site. If you already own a domain easier to just have an external dns entry added for remote.yourdomain.com added and point to the external ip address. Then if you change email or IIS down the road it will already be there.
0
 
LVL 58

Assisted Solution

by:Cliff Galiher
Cliff Galiher earned 250 total points
ID: 33442963
You should use an internet address regardless of whether the services are hosted. The website can remain where it is (SBS was never meant to host internet websites anyways, so this is its intended configuration) where the SBS content exists using a subdomain of the domain name configured (remote.<domainname> by default.)
More concerning is the email management. Email will get delivered to the server that the public MX record points to, so using hosted email is also quite possible. With that said, the major reason to deploy SBS over a standard Windows Server deployment is to get the integrated server, exchange, and sharepoint management. If you aren't using the exchange component of SBS, as you would not be in a hosted setup, then you aren't really using the power of SBS and a standard server migration would be both more economical and actually easier to manage.
In short, SBS may not be the right product for the planned usage patterns you've outlined.
-Cliff
 
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In the event you manage a Small Business Server 2003, and you are audited for PCI compliance, there are several changes you must make in order to pass the audit. I can take no credit for discovering any of these fixes or workarounds, but there is no…
This guide is intended to provide step by step instructions on how to migrate from Small Business Server 2003 to Small Business Server 2011. NOTE: This guide has been written using the preview version of SBS2011 therefore some of the screens may …
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…
Add bar graphs to Access queries using Unicode block characters. Graphs appear on every record in the color you want. Give life to numbers. Hopes this gives you ideas on visualizing your data in new ways ~ Create a calculated field in a query: …

617 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question