Solved

Test remote Exchange 2007 SCR

Posted on 2010-08-16
4
505 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
We have a remote site for disaster recovery purposes.  I've got an Active Directory server with GC but no FSMO roles and an Exchange 2007 server running as a SCR target.  This setup is supposed to only be activated in the event of a full disaster.  The trick is how to test this configuration in a non-destructive manor.  By that I mean, not destroying FMSO masters because I've seized roles, destroying Exchange servers because they believe they're the master server for a storage group, loosing e-mails, etc.

If I create a test Storage group and a few test mail boxes on the SCR source and have these replicate through to the offsite SCR target.  If I break the link between the sites, will I be able to run the Exchange commands to update Active Directory for the Exchange mailboxes on the remaining AD box?  As this Active Directory server does not have any FSMO roles.  Looking at the FSMO roles, perhaps only the RID master may get used.  But as objects are being updated rather than created, it doesn't look like an issue to me, but I'm no AD expert.  Or are there any other problems with this appoach as it's not something I've tried before in a production environment?

My guess is when I reconnect the sites, the offsite AD server will update the onsite AD servers that the test storage group has moved.  After either forcing an AD replication or leaving it a while, I'll be able to remove the test storage group from the original Exchange SCR source.

Thanks for any help.
0
Comment
Question by:RenovoIT
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:dhruvarajp
ID: 33444288
0
 

Author Comment

by:RenovoIT
ID: 33465102
Thanks for the response.  The scripts were interesting and have been implemented as a nice way to see if SCR is working.  But they don't help with this question.  Thanks again for the scripts.
0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
dhruvarajp earned 500 total points
ID: 33465204
for DR test or Proof of concept if would go for a seperate test enviorment
.. preferably virtualized.. for sure isolated
that is the best practice
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:RenovoIT
ID: 33499282
It's pretty much what we're going to do.  Virtualise, isolate, test then destroy the virtual guests.
0

Featured Post

Are your AD admin tools letting you down?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Following basic email etiquette rules will help you write a professional email and achieve a good, lasting impression with your contacts.
In this article, I am going to show you how to simulate a multi-site Lab environment on a single Hyper-V host. I use this method successfully in my own lab to simulate three fully routed global AD Sites on a Windows 10 Hyper-V host.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles to another domain controller. Log onto the new domain controller with a user account t…
The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability groups. The components of this video include: 1. Automatic Failover 2. Failover Clustering 3. Active Manager

803 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question