[2 days left] What’s wrong with your cloud strategy? Learn why multicloud solutions matter with Nimble Storage.Register Now

x
?
Solved

OSPF * and traffic share count

Posted on 2010-08-18
5
Medium Priority
?
690 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
What does the * and the traffic share count mean?

Will the traffic be equal cost load balanced between the two paths xxx.xx.192.3 and xxx.xx..192.4?



switch#sh ip route 11.136.10.26
Routing entry for 11.136.0.0/16
  Known via "ospf 777", distance 110, metric 2, type intra area
  Last update from xxx.xx.192.4 on Vlan900, 01:12:38 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * xxx.xx..192.4, from xxx.xx..136.4, 01:12:38 ago, via Vlan900
      Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
    xxx.xx..192.3, from xxx.xx..136.4, 01:12:38 ago, via Vlan900
      Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1

switch#sh ip route xxx.xx..192.4
Routing entry for xxx.xx..192.0/24
  Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * directly connected, via Vlan900
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
0
Comment
Question by:Dragon0x40
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:rfc1180
ID: 33471021
The 2 routes you see are the equal cost routes (I am sure you know this); each block is one route, the asterisk "*" next to one of the block entries (The first one is this case) corresponds to the active route that will be used for any new traffic (This could be for a single packet or an entire new flow to the destination).

Billy
0
 

Author Comment

by:Dragon0x40
ID: 33471579
thanks rfc1180,

when I run the show ip route 11.136.0.0 and repeat many times the * never moves to the other route?

According to the following  link "traffic share count 1" means that 1 packet goes on one route and the next 1 packet goes the next route and alternates packet by packet. Does not make sense to me as what you said about flows being switched makes more sense.

http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco@groupstudy.com/msg102296.html
0
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:rfc1180
ID: 33471594
it depending what you are using for the switching method:

CEF:
Per-Destination and Per-Packet Load Balancing

Billy
0
 

Author Comment

by:Dragon0x40
ID: 33471701
How do I tell which switching method I am using?

Does the traffic show that I am not routing any packets through CEF?

#sh ip cef detail
IP Distributed CEF with switching (Table Version 1367), flags=0x0
  547 routes, 0 reresolve, 0 unresolved (0 old, 0 new), peak 1
  9 instant recursive resolutions, 0 used background process
  547 leaves, 48 nodes, 126800 bytes, 973 inserts, 426 invalidations
  5 load sharing elements, 1680 bytes, 5 references
  universal per-destination load sharing algorithm, id 17093EB8
  3(0) CEF resets, 229 revisions of existing leaves
  Resolution Timer: Exponential (currently 1s, peak 1s)
  224 in-place/0 aborted modifications
  refcounts:  13594 leaf, 12544 node

  Table epoch: 0 (547 entries at this epoch)

Adjacency Table has 516 adjacencies
0.0.0.0/0, version 966, epoch 0, cached adjacency 10.192.9.1
0 packets, 0 bytes
  via 10.192.9.1, 0 dependencies, recursive
    next hop 10.192.9.1, GigabitEthernet9/48 via 10.192.9.1/32 (Default)
    valid cached adjacency
0.0.0.0/32, version 0, epoch 0, receive

11.136.0.0/16, version 1356, epoch 0
0 packets, 0 bytes
  via xxx.xx..192.4, Vlan900, 0 dependencies
    traffic share 1
    next hop xxx.xx..192.4, Vlan900
    valid adjacency
  via xxx.xx..192.3, Vlan900, 0 dependencies
    traffic share 1
    next hop xxx.xx..192.3, Vlan900
    valid adjacency
  0 packets, 0 bytes switched through the prefix
  tmstats: external 0 packets, 0 bytes
           internal 0 packets, 0 bytes

#sh ip cef traffic prefix-length
IP prefix length switching statistics:
----------------------------------------
Prefix       Number of       Number of
Length       Packets         Bytes
----------------------------------------
     0               0               0
     1               0               0
     2               0               0
     3               0               0
     4               0               0
     5               0               0
     6               0               0
     7               0               0
     8               0               0
     9               0               0
    10               0               0
    11               0               0
    12               0               0
    13               0               0
    14               0               0
    15               0               0
    16               0               0
    17               0               0
    18               0               0
    19               0               0
    20               0               0
    21               0               0
    22               0               0
    23               0               0
    24               0               0
    25               0               0
    26               0               0
    27               0               0
    28               0               0
----------------------------------------
Prefix       Number of       Number of
Length       Packets         Bytes
----------------------------------------
    29               0               0
    30               0               0
    31               0               0
    32               0               0
0
 
LVL 24

Accepted Solution

by:
rfc1180 earned 2000 total points
ID: 33471987
 5 load sharing elements, 1680 bytes, 5 references
  universal per-destination load sharing algorithm, id 17093EB8

Billy
0

Featured Post

Will your db performance match your db growth?

In Percona’s white paper “Performance at Scale: Keeping Your Database on Its Toes,” we take a high-level approach to what you need to think about when planning for database scalability.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Hello to you all, I hear of many people congratulate AWS (Amazon Web Services) on how easy it is to spin up and create new EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances, but then fail and struggle to connect to them using simple tools such as SSH (Secure…
AWS has developed and created its highly available global infrastructure allowing users to deploy and manage their estates all across the world through the use of the following geographical components   RegionsAvailability ZonesEdge Locations  Wh…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Suggested Courses

649 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question