?
Solved

virtualize a fileserver?

Posted on 2010-08-19
4
Medium Priority
?
997 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
hi experts,

we have about 30 people working here and our fileserver has about 200 GB data,
doc,xls,jpg,tiff,pdf.
Is ist okay to virtualize this server (win2003), so that all files are stored inside this VM?

We have 2 ESX4 Server each running 5 VMs which are stored on a HP MSA2312i(15krpm SAS disks).(HA enabled)

Or are there any disadvantages with virtualizing a fileserver?  (performance, security..)

lenn0x
 
0
Comment
Question by:lenn0x
4 Comments
 
LVL 24

Accepted Solution

by:
Luciano Patrão earned 1000 total points
ID: 33473227
Hi

I have virtualize many File Servers

After you virtualize a Server, then you can treated as a normal Physical Server regarding the security.

The performance, just need to create the Server, create a Virtual Disk to hold the files(here you can use a normal disk or a LUN connected directly to the server a RAW disk). The write/read performance will always depend your Storage to hold your Data Files

If you need more information just ask please

Jail
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:bgoering
bgoering earned 600 total points
ID: 33473423
You should hove no issues virtualizaing a file server of that size. I would stick with vmdk files for the data as opposed to rdm. Only thing to watch is snapshots if this is heavily accessed on write, they can grow rather quickly and take forever to commit the data back to the base disk.

Good Luck
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:chkdsk01
chkdsk01 earned 400 total points
ID: 33474002
In my opinion, I do not like to virtualize file servers.  Functionally it's fine to virtualize them.  You won't have any problems virtualizing  a file server.  But in a case like yours and, I'm guessing a number of other people with VMware in a production environment with decent storage for the backend, I would rather just put the file shares on my storage.  Why have another windows server with patches, antivirus, virtualization overhead, and all the security holes that go along with windows, when you could possibly create some cifs shares on your NAS/SAN.  Just my 2 cents.  But to answer your question, no, there shouldn''t be any problems virtualizing your file server
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:lenn0x
ID: 33474599
thank you all!
@chkdsk01, yes, I thought about this, maybe I will do so later, after the fileserver ist virtualized. I'm just in a bit of a  hurry to get this done..
0

Featured Post

Fill in the form and get your FREE NFR key NOW!

Veeam is happy to provide a FREE NFR server license to certified engineers, trainers, and bloggers.  It allows for the non‑production use of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows. This license is valid for five workstations and two servers.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article, I will show you HOW TO: Perform a Physical to Virtual (P2V) Conversion the easy way from a computer backup (image).
In this article will go through how to backup a vPostgres DB from a broken vCenter Appliance and restore to a new vCenter Appliance.
Teach the user how to use vSphere Update Manager to update the VMware Tools and virtual machine hardware version Open vSphere Client: Review manual processes for updating VMware Tools and virtual hardware versions: Create a new baseline group in vSp…
This course is ideal for IT System Administrators working with VMware vSphere and its associated products in their company infrastructure. This course teaches you how to install and maintain this virtualization technology to store data, prevent vuln…
Suggested Courses

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question