Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of LenCepeda
LenCepeda

asked on

Backup hardware and software alternatives for large amount of tif images.

Hi - I am looking looking for suggestions for a backup problem our office is having.  We use Symantec Backup Exec v12 (windows) to backup to tape (HP Storageworks Ultrium 1840 - LTO4) direct connection to server.

Currently, we have a rather large directory of .tif images, approximately:

16 million files, totalling about 780GB
converted = 817,889 280 KB
converted = 798,720 MB

We setup a FULL backup on Friday and Differential Backups Mon-Thurs

The problem is the job takes too long and eventually fails.  The Full Friday job runs approsimately 60 Hours and the Mon-Thurs is up to 11 hours.

Thats about a job rate of about 221MB per minute for the full friday job. LTO4 is rated much higher.

At some point within the next 3 months we are planning to implement a new BDR solution that should aid us with this backup and every other backup in the company, but the ploblem is that we need to get this corrected in the interim by any means.  Even though we replicate this entire server and have a working reduntant available off-site, we need to get some sort of nightly / weekly backup solution in place to comply with our partners regulatory auditors.
Avatar of bluepig
bluepig

As a first step, why not create two backup jobs - each job backs up half the data. It means changing the tape more often, but at least you will get the data backed up.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of dax_bad
dax_bad
Flag of Denmark image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Let me guess, are the files read from a single drive (SATA) or from multiple SATA drives but one at a time ?

It is probably not a problem of the backup software but the server hardware ie. the reading of 16M files. Running so slowly means the tape drive is running out of data, re-winding and writing 3secs of data stop, rewind ..
It is not good for the drive or tape life to be used like that. The system should be able to supply 40MB/s minimum and ideally >200MB/s (eg. 6x 10Krpm SAS in RAID5 array, >600 IO/s random 64KB reads or more if files are badly fragmented). My part tape backups take 1hrs-2hrs, but 4 hrs for a full tape with the newer tape drives that doubled their capacity while only a 20%-50% increase to max tape speed. I would not like a backup to go any longer than that because of the shoe shinning (stop-reverse-start).

Should be using RAID array, and a defrag program that arranges/orders the files by filename.

Please provide more details:
1) Is 20% added each week or 20% changed in the week ? Are files temporary to a job, randomly referred to or can they be archived separate to recent files ?
2) How similar are the files? Are they already compressed ?
3) Are they scanned pages of documents? It would be better if multipage documents were stored as one file eg. multi-page TIFF, fax document, PDF or 100 per ZIP file.
4) Should a document/image management system be used to arrange and save meta data for searching and grouping?
5) Are you accessing files from another system over a network or from a NAS ?
6) What server/hardware config do you have ? CPU, RAM, MB, disks, RAID, network (if applicable), OS ?

Some backup products allow you to interleave several backup sources (parallel) to read from multiple disk volumes independently. Some options allow you to stage a backup (need a spare 1.5TB HD) to reduce the backup window and load on the tape because by then it's sequential.
Avatar of LenCepeda

ASKER

Thanks very much for your very quick responses.  I guess I should have included more information in my orginal post.

1. This is a single LTO 4 tape streamer
2. The backup software is installed on the server and the tape drive is an external attachment to the server (Ultra 320 SCSI)
3. There is a Windows Storage server on the LAN that stores archived images from the .tif server - 1Gbps
4. Our document (image) management software "Imageright" runs a nightly archive which deletes images from the .tif server (older than two years) and copies them to the Storage Server.  i thought the archive / deletion process copleted prior to the backup job running but i will confirm
5. The .tif server is a DELL poweredge 2850 6 350GB SCSI HD Raid 5
6. Images are stored and grouped by the "Imageright" application, most files are scanned single page .tif images with some pdf / .doc files mixed in.
7. AVG anti virus scan runs every night at 4am, which runs into the backup job.  i have just amended that to run weekly at 8pm on sunday
8. Double-Take replication is real time (i beleive) i will need to double check that!!!

Right now, i intend on disabling the the archive feature on the document management system this weekend and the anti virus scan to see if there is a difference this weekend.

thanks
All your queries will be answered by this document.
http://support.veritas.com/docs/231488
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
THANKS