• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 640
  • Last Modified:

Backup hardware and software alternatives for large amount of tif images.

Hi - I am looking looking for suggestions for a backup problem our office is having.  We use Symantec Backup Exec v12 (windows) to backup to tape (HP Storageworks Ultrium 1840 - LTO4) direct connection to server.

Currently, we have a rather large directory of .tif images, approximately:

16 million files, totalling about 780GB
converted = 817,889 280 KB
converted = 798,720 MB

We setup a FULL backup on Friday and Differential Backups Mon-Thurs

The problem is the job takes too long and eventually fails.  The Full Friday job runs approsimately 60 Hours and the Mon-Thurs is up to 11 hours.

Thats about a job rate of about 221MB per minute for the full friday job. LTO4 is rated much higher.

At some point within the next 3 months we are planning to implement a new BDR solution that should aid us with this backup and every other backup in the company, but the ploblem is that we need to get this corrected in the interim by any means.  Even though we replicate this entire server and have a working reduntant available off-site, we need to get some sort of nightly / weekly backup solution in place to comply with our partners regulatory auditors.
0
LenCepeda
Asked:
LenCepeda
2 Solutions
 
bluepigCommented:
As a first step, why not create two backup jobs - each job backs up half the data. It means changing the tape more often, but at least you will get the data backed up.
0
 
dax_badCommented:
Do you only have a single LTO4 tape streamer?

What's the network bandwidth between the .tif server and the  backup server? 100Mbps / 1Gbps or more?

Is there any SAN attached storage connected to the tif server?

Im guessing you have a 1Gbps LAN

First,  i'd make sure that it's not the anti virus scanning every single file (on access scans) during backup, that could really kill the performance

Second, make sure your NICs and switches are all set to Full Duplex, not auto or half duplx or a mix because the lowest will trumph

Also keep in mind that it always takes more time backup of 780GB of small files rather than 780GB of a big files. And when does the replication occur? That could also slow down the performance of the backup and congest the LAN bandwidth.  

For your future project consider multiple tapestreamers and reserve 1 of them to this backup set and let the remaining streamers handle the normal backup / restores.

You will never get 100% NIC utilization on backup, it's wishfull thinking :-)

Cheers
Daniel
0
 
tygrus2Commented:
Let me guess, are the files read from a single drive (SATA) or from multiple SATA drives but one at a time ?

It is probably not a problem of the backup software but the server hardware ie. the reading of 16M files. Running so slowly means the tape drive is running out of data, re-winding and writing 3secs of data stop, rewind ..
It is not good for the drive or tape life to be used like that. The system should be able to supply 40MB/s minimum and ideally >200MB/s (eg. 6x 10Krpm SAS in RAID5 array, >600 IO/s random 64KB reads or more if files are badly fragmented). My part tape backups take 1hrs-2hrs, but 4 hrs for a full tape with the newer tape drives that doubled their capacity while only a 20%-50% increase to max tape speed. I would not like a backup to go any longer than that because of the shoe shinning (stop-reverse-start).

Should be using RAID array, and a defrag program that arranges/orders the files by filename.

Please provide more details:
1) Is 20% added each week or 20% changed in the week ? Are files temporary to a job, randomly referred to or can they be archived separate to recent files ?
2) How similar are the files? Are they already compressed ?
3) Are they scanned pages of documents? It would be better if multipage documents were stored as one file eg. multi-page TIFF, fax document, PDF or 100 per ZIP file.
4) Should a document/image management system be used to arrange and save meta data for searching and grouping?
5) Are you accessing files from another system over a network or from a NAS ?
6) What server/hardware config do you have ? CPU, RAM, MB, disks, RAID, network (if applicable), OS ?

Some backup products allow you to interleave several backup sources (parallel) to read from multiple disk volumes independently. Some options allow you to stage a backup (need a spare 1.5TB HD) to reduce the backup window and load on the tape because by then it's sequential.
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LenCepedaAuthor Commented:
Thanks very much for your very quick responses.  I guess I should have included more information in my orginal post.

1. This is a single LTO 4 tape streamer
2. The backup software is installed on the server and the tape drive is an external attachment to the server (Ultra 320 SCSI)
3. There is a Windows Storage server on the LAN that stores archived images from the .tif server - 1Gbps
4. Our document (image) management software "Imageright" runs a nightly archive which deletes images from the .tif server (older than two years) and copies them to the Storage Server.  i thought the archive / deletion process copleted prior to the backup job running but i will confirm
5. The .tif server is a DELL poweredge 2850 6 350GB SCSI HD Raid 5
6. Images are stored and grouped by the "Imageright" application, most files are scanned single page .tif images with some pdf / .doc files mixed in.
7. AVG anti virus scan runs every night at 4am, which runs into the backup job.  i have just amended that to run weekly at 8pm on sunday
8. Double-Take replication is real time (i beleive) i will need to double check that!!!

Right now, i intend on disabling the the archive feature on the document management system this weekend and the anti virus scan to see if there is a difference this weekend.

thanks
0
 
tussharawaghanCommented:
All your queries will be answered by this document.
http://support.veritas.com/docs/231488
0
 
tygrus2Commented:
So the tape drive is connected to the tif server not the Storage server ?
Are you doing backups over the LAN by reading from the Storage server (archived files)?
Are you using the backup agent on the server without the tape drive and is it properly configured and in use ?

You might have to test your setup after-hours. Can you run a few speed tests
1) 2GB of small files across network.
2) 4GB of >200MB files accross network.
3) Backup the above sets of files (2 jobs) from the local RAID and over the network.  
4) Test raw network speed. There are program that operates as client/server to test in both directions (eg. netspeed).
Check task manager, windows perfmon etc. for IO rate, network, CPU %.
5) Check any suggested system changes using the above.
0
 
LenCepedaAuthor Commented:
THANKS
0

Featured Post

Get expert help—faster!

Need expert help—fast? Use the Help Bell for personalized assistance getting answers to your important questions.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now